Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br /> 17 April 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0100 <br />' Page 6 of 6 <br />.' 3.4. GROUND WATER ELEVATION, FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT <br /> A California state-licensed survey engineer from Baumbach&Piazza Inc. surveyed a reference point <br />' on the top of each ground water monitoring well casing at the site to the nearest 0.01-foot relative <br /> to the San Joaquin County Bench Mark Datum # BM3M-37. The results of the monitoring well <br /> survey are contained in Table 3. The surveying report (Baumbach & Piazza) is presented in <br />' Appendix C. <br /> Depth to ground water at the site ranged from 42.35 to 43.68 feet below well casing tops on the two <br />' occasions that depth to water was measured. The ground water elevation in each well were calculated <br /> from these data. The ground water elevations at the site ranged from 72.00 feet to 74.11 feet above <br /> mean sea level (msl). The ground water flow direction and gradient were calculated from the well <br />' elevation data collected on two separate occasions. <br /> Contours of the ground water elevation data suggest that the ground water flow was directed toward <br />' the north away from the former on <br /> area, shifting in the down-gradient direction toward the <br /> northwest. Ground water gradient was calculated to be 0.06 away the former UST area. Figure 3 <br /> lie illustrates the contoured ground water elevations as measured on various dates. <br />' 3.5. DOMESTIC WELL SAMPLE ANALYSIS <br />' A water sample was collected from two of the domestic drinking water wells on the site (well 1 and <br /> well 2). The well pump was operated for one minute. A sample was collected from the dedicated <br /> sample tap on the well head; the sample was collected in three 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic <br />' analysis (VOA) vials. <br /> The sample was stored in a chilled container and transported under chain-of-custody to a DHS- <br /> certified laboratory. The sample was analyzed for constituents listed in Section 2.6. <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons and fuel oxygenates were not detected above the reporting limits in the <br />' sample collected From the domestic wells on the site (Appendix F). <br /> _ 4.0.,=._SUMMARY„AND.CONCLUSIONS_.._:— <br /> The following conclusions were drawn from the results of this investigation: <br /> • The ground water flow direction inferred from measurements taken on two occasions at the <br /> site is generally northward. <br /> • MTBE was detected in one well on the site at a concentration of 97 4gll by Method 8260 <br />' Advanced Geol nvironmental,Inc. <br />