Laserfiche WebLink
06 December 1995 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 95-0100 <br /> Page 1 I of 13 <br /> 5.3. EX-SITU TREATMENT OF HYDROCARBON-IMPACTED SOIL <br /> Hydrocarbon-impacted soil can be excavated and treated on-site or transported off-site for disposal. <br /> On-site treatment alternatives (ex-situ) include aeration, bioremediation, vapor extraction, and <br /> thermal destruction. All are feasible methods of remediating sandy soil contaminated with gasoline. <br /> However, increasing clay content decreases the effectiveness of each method. Offsite disposal <br /> generally involves the transportation of the impacted soil to a licensed treatment/disposal facility. <br /> 5.3,1. EXCAVATION <br /> All of the above mentioned methods of ex-situ treatment require excavation of the impacted soil. <br /> Impacted soil in the vadose zone extends to a depth of approximately 40 feet bsg at. the site. <br /> Therefore, soil would have to excavated to depths of 40 feet bsg at the Franklyn Cole site. The <br /> impacted soil may also extend under the building on site and under Chrisinan Road on the east. <br /> Once excavated, the impacted soil would be stockpiled for on-site treatment or transportation for <br /> treatment/disposal. If soil is treated on-site and hydrocarbon concentrations can be reduced to non- <br /> detectable (ND) levels, or concentrations acceptable to the lead regulatory agency, the soil can be <br /> used to backfill the excavation; if soil is disposed of off-site, backfill must be imported for the <br /> excavation, adding to the cost of the project. <br /> 53.2. FEASIBILITY OF EXCAVATION <br /> Excavation of impacted soil, followed by ex-situ treatment and/or disposal, is a very effective method <br /> of remediation; non-detect (ND) can usually be achieved by excavation since, theoretically, all <br /> contaminated soil is removed. However, excavation is usually too costly if the volume of impacted <br /> soil is great or if the impacted soil is present at depths requiring special equipment or extensive <br /> shoring. Both special excavation equipment and shoring would be required at the Franklyn Cole site. <br /> _ Hydrocarbon-impacted soil beneath buildings or roads usually cannot be addressed by excavation, <br /> as the structural integrity of the structures may he compromised. Additionally, it is unlikely that the <br /> County of San Joaquin would allow excavation of the impacted soil under Chrisman Road if the <br /> plume extends that far. <br /> On-site treatment would also be limited at the site due to the close proximity of Jefferson School, <br /> immediately southeast of the property. Air permits and special handling of the soil would most likely <br /> be required. <br />