Laserfiche WebLink
Geological Techlacs Inc. Page 4 <br /> Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No. 662.2 <br /> January 27,2004 <br /> v 2.0 FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION <br /> The results of the groundwater sample analysis show the following: <br /> • MW-I contained the gasoline oxygenate MTBE at 720 �tgll. This is consistent with past <br /> results. <br /> • MW-2, which is upgradient of the former USTs, has not contained contaminant <br /> ~ concentrations above the laboratory detection limits for all quarterly events completed <br /> thus far in the investigation. <br /> Ln • MW-3 contained the gasoline oxygenate MTBE at 1300 pg/l. <br /> • The detections of ETBE and TAME in wells MW-1 and MW-3 are intermittent and <br /> appear to be dependent on elevated MTBE concentrations and associated elevated <br /> �•• reporting limits. <br /> • Deep screened well MW-104 contained 2.8 ug/l MTBE. This is the sixth consecutive <br /> event in which this well has tested positive for MTBE, however the concentrations are <br /> La the lowest observed to date. <br /> • Figure 4: MTBE vs. Groundwater Elevation -- MW-3 illustrates a fairly direct <br /> relationship between the concentration of MTBE in groundwater and the elevation of <br /> groundwater in well MW-3. A linear trend line has been added to the figure to show a <br /> - general decline in both groundwater elevation and MTBE concentrations over time. <br /> • Neither BTEX nor TPH-G was present in any of the groundwater samples above the <br /> laboratory reporting limits. <br /> • In accordance with San Joaquin County directives, the groundwater samples were also <br /> L. analyzed for diesel, methanol, ethanol, 1,2-DCA, EBD and lead. The samples did not <br /> contain any of these constituents above the laboratory reporting limits. <br /> • Table 3 includes Dissolved Oxygen (DO) and Oxidation-Reduction Potential (ORP) <br /> measurements for the site's wells. All four of the wells show low DO and low positive <br /> values suggesting that the plume may be stable. <br /> `= GTI makes the following conclusions: <br /> • The lateral extent of the groundwater contamination plume is only defined upgradient to <br /> k„ the northwest by MW-2. <br /> • . The vertical extent has not been defined since well MW-104 continues to exhibit low <br /> concentrations of MTBE. However, given the low concentration of MTBE in the well, <br /> Le we believe it to be near the bottom of the contaminant plume. <br /> Project Status Review: <br /> L. • Perform plume definition and evaluate the mass of contaminants present by installing <br /> additional monitoring wells. GTI had submitted to the SJC PHS/EHD a "Soil & <br /> Groundwater Investigation Work Plan" dated October 8, 2001. The work plan was <br /> approved with conditions in the SJC PHS/EHD's October 26, 2001 correspondence. <br />