Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> lilt <br /> I <br /> I 1 <br /> i� JI <br /> Methods and Procedures <br /> _ The ground water was sampled in six monitoring wells by a Western <br /> Geo-Engineers (WEGE) geologist, working directly, under the <br /> supervision of California Registered Geologist #3037: Using a <br /> resistance probe, WEGE personnel measured the depth: to ground <br /> ! water prior to sampling each well. A product thickness was then <br /> measured using a cleaned, clear bailers. A fresh bailer was used <br /> for each well . These special bailers are designed and built by <br /> WEGE to recover the exact product thickness. If no .product was ; <br /> present in the well, a water sample was' collected. <br /> 9 <br /> Each well was purged before collecting water samples. MW1 , MW2, j <br /> MW3, MW5, MW6 and MW7 were sampled after purging the wells of j <br /> enough water that temperature, pH and conductivitystailized. <br /> This data is presented in Appendix B. . The purged water was <br /> contained in a labeled, secured 55 gallon drum on site. From the I <br /> well information a ground water contour surface was plotted and a <br /> flow direction inferred. This is presented in Figure 4. <br /> The wells were allowed to recover after purging. A water sample <br /> was then collected -with a fresh bailer'. Each sample was divided 1 <br /> among four 40-m1 vials. The vials are supplied by the laboratory <br /> or a chemical supply company and are pre-cleaned to exact EPA <br /> } protocols . The sample vials were labeled as to station, well, <br /> time and sampler, and documented on the chain-of-custody sheet. <br /> They were then placed into an ice chest and cooled to 4-C with <br /> ice. The samples were delivered to a California State Certified <br /> Laboratory and signed over to the lab using standard chain-of- <br /> custody procedures . } <br /> CHEMICAL ANALYSIS RESULTS <br /> i <br /> The samples were analyzed at Chemtech Analytical Laboratories <br /> (DHS#359 ) for Total Fuel Hydrocarbons (gasoline) , with BTEX <br /> distinction, utilizing EPA Methods 5030 and 602, respectively. As <br /> noted under Purpose and Scope above, water samples were collected <br /> from MW1 , MW2 , MW3 , MW5, MW6 and MW7 . Of these laboratory- <br /> analyzed samples , all samples were Below Reportable Limits (BRL) J <br /> with the exception of MW3 which contained 15 ppb Benzene. r <br /> The analytical results and the pertinent gathering data are listed <br /> in Table 1 , and the laboratory report is included in Appendix C. ` <br /> ' HYDROCARBON CONTAMINATION i <br /> The wells sampled during this monitor round indicate non r <br /> detect for petroleum hydrocarbons with the exception of MW3 . The <br /> aquifer test data (Appendix A) along with the lithologic cross <br /> section and hydraulic gradient across the site infer that <br /> velocities of the ground water ares such that natural bio- <br /> degradation is taking place. <br /> F 3 <br />