Laserfiche WebLink
R I <br /> I <br /> - <br /> J <br /> CONCLUSIONS y <br /> 1 . MW3 showed 15 ppb Benzene. All other wells , showed no 1 <br /> detectable levels of contamination. <br /> 2. The ground water flow direction is presently in; a south, <br /> southeasterly direction. <br /> 3. S1 , S2 and MW4 were not sampled. MW-4 could not be located. <br /> Sl and S-2 were dry. <br /> LIMITATIONS j <br /> The discussion and conclusions presented in this report:_ are based <br /> on the following: <br /> 1 . The observations and data collected„ by field personnel . <br /> 2. The results of laboratory analyses performed by a state <br /> certified lab. <br /> 3 . Our understanding of the regulations of the State . of <br /> California and San Joaquin County and/or City of Lodi,:� California. <br /> 4. Review of existing literature concerning this site and the } <br /> San Joaquin County area. <br /> Changes in ground water conditions can occur due to variations in { <br /> rainfall, temperature, local and regional water usage and local <br /> construction practices . In addition, variations in the soil and <br /> ground water conditions could exist beyond the points explored in <br /> this investigation. <br /> State certified analytical results are included in this report. <br /> This laboratory follows EPA and State of California approved <br /> procedures ; however, WEGE is not responsible for errors in these <br /> laboratory results . <br /> 1 <br /> i <br /> � I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> 4 <br /> a <br /> i <br />