Laserfiche WebLink
MAR-30-2000 16 37 CAMBR I A 51.0 420 9170 P 08/10 <br /> woo <br /> asoo <br /> 4oaa MTBE Rasultm from 9 GPM Pilot Test <br /> 3600 - <br /> M Rosufts of 30 GPM HiPOx 8yatem <br /> 9000 <br /> Dostnscbon of MTBE as a function of Applied Ozone fora GPM Pilot <br /> 2500 Test <br /> 0 DesVuabon ofMT13E as a functrpn of Applied Ozone in 30 GPM HiPOx <br /> System <br /> � R=W 0 A961 <br /> 1006 <br /> 800 <br /> O <br /> op tA4 200 30.0 400 Soo wo 700 800 BO0 1000 <br /> opm 03 <br /> Figure 4 Comparison of Pilot Test and 30 GPM Systems <br /> The actual treatment cost at the Nevada site include all the consumables, oxygen and <br /> hydrogen peroxide, power, and the lease of the HiPOx system are shown in Figure 5 The <br /> unit cost of oxygen and hydrogen peroxide will vary by location and proximity to suppliers <br /> • The cost of power will also vary based on local utility rates. The consumption rate of oxygen <br /> and hydrogen peroxide is a function of the site contamination and flow rate The costs as <br /> shown in Figure 5 are based on a flow rate of 30 GPM and an average influent MTBE <br /> concentration of 4,000 ppb and an effluent requirement of < 100 ppb. The total operating <br /> cost at the Nevada site between 1119/1999 and 2/1/2000 was $3553 48 and 2,825,179 <br /> gallons of water were treated resulting a cost for consumables (oxygen, hydrogen peroxide <br /> and power) of $0.00126 per gallon The lease cost of the HiPOx system is shown as capital <br /> and adds $0 0032 per gallon, resulting in a total treatment cost of$0 00446 per gallon. <br /> $342 367 $1,255 14 <br /> $060 3,185 1,91089 <br /> $007 5,535 38745 <br /> Total Utility = $3,55348 <br /> 2,825,179 <br /> $000126 <br /> 000320 <br /> Total Cost = $0.00446 <br /> . <br /> Figure 5. Operating Cost at Spark from 11/9199 to 21112000. <br /> Page 7 <br />