My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003824
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
L
>
LOOMIS
>
2969
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545428
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0003824
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2020 1:14:17 PM
Creation date
3/9/2020 10:41:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0003824
RECORD_ID
PR0545428
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005487
FACILITY_NAME
MARCIS DIESEL SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
2969
STREET_NAME
LOOMIS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2969 LOOMIS RD
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Geologica(Tacfvnws Inc Page 2 <br /> ' Groundwater Monitoring Report <br /> Project No 770 2 <br /> October 15,2002 <br /> ' On June 21, 2002, the wells were re-surveyed in accordance with the Geotracker <br /> requirements by Thompson-Hysell Engineering of Modesto, CA <br /> Groundwater gradient calculations show that groundwater flow in the water table wells was <br /> S8°E with a slope of 0 013 ft/ft-"'The deeper aquifer groundwater flow was N88°E with a <br /> ' slope of 0 0016 ft/ft Based on a previous consultant's data this site has a history of variable <br /> groundwater flow direction GTI's monitoring efforts confirm that groundwater direction / <br /> vanes from quarter to quarter at the site <br /> ' 1.0 GROUNDWATER MONITORING <br /> 1.1 Hydrogeology of Site <br /> ' The site exhibits a primarily silty/clayey geology with minor sand layers/lenses, pebbles, <br /> black organics and iron staining occasionally present The groundwater elevation on June <br /> ' 7, 2002, averaged —36 54 feet mean sea level (MSL) or —60 feet below grade surface (bgs) <br /> This represents a decrease of about 1 5 feet since the March 2001 monitoring event <br /> On June 21, 2002, the wells were re-surveyed in accordance with the Geotracker <br /> requirements by Thompson-Hysell Engineering of Modesto, CA The above data are <br /> normalized to these new data <br /> Groundwater elevation and gradient data are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, Appendix A - <br /> ' Water table well gradient direction is shown on Figure 2A. and deep well gradient direction <br /> is illustrated in Figure 2B IThe historical water table gradients are illustrated in Figure 3 <br /> Groundwater Gradient Rose Diagram Water Table Wells The site displays highly variable <br /> shifts in groundwater direction <br /> Vertical Groundwater Gradients <br /> ' Under vertical groundwater flow conditions, the water level in a monitoring well is a <br /> function of the length of the well screen and its depth or vertical position in the aquifer As <br /> with horizontal flow conditions, the diameter of the well or piezometer is immaterial <br />' The following procedure is used to calculate vertical groundwater gradient <br />' • Determine vertical distance between the two measuring devices by the distance from the <br /> mid-point between the top and bottom seal of the deep well (MW-105) and the mid- <br /> point between the groundwater elevation and the bottom seal in the shallow well (MW- <br /> 5) _ <br /> • Measure the head in both wells used in the calculations <br /> • If the lateral distance between the well pair is greater than a few feet, then calculations <br /> must be made to correct the down-gradient piezometric head to account for the sloping <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.