Laserfiche WebLink
Monitoring Well Installation Report <br /> ID Quik Stop Market No 121 <br /> Page 9 <br /> site, near monitoring wells MW-3 and RW-1, and on the northwest side at MW-1 Perimeter <br /> wells MW-2, MW-5 and MW-7 are currently free of detectable TPHg and BTEX compounds <br /> Groundwater in the vicinity of monitoring well MW-3 and RW-I were reported to have the <br /> highest contaminant concentrations of TPHg and MTBE at the subject site It appears some <br /> TPHg and MTBE has migrated to a lower portion of the aquifer, at a depth of 33 to 43 feet, as <br /> detected in the water sample collected at MW-4 (Figures 5 and 6) Low concentrations (less <br /> than 10 ug/1) of MTBE were detected at the two perimeter wells, MW-5 and MW-7, located on <br /> the south and southeast sides of the site However, no petroleum hydrocarbon contamination was <br /> detected from the deepest site well (screened from 65 to 75 feet) as reported at MW-6 It appears <br /> vertical continuity of the aquifer is limited <br /> A review of the site hydrogeology data indicates monitoring well MW-6 is screened within a <br /> separate aquifer This is based on the fact that the hydrostatic water level was measured <br /> approximately 5 to 6 feet higher than the other seven site wells, which are screened at shallower <br /> depths The boring log from CPT-1 (located in the vicinity of monitoring wells MW-3, MW-4 <br /> and MW-6, Figure 2) shows two clay, clayey silt and sandy silt horizons between 43 and 47 feet <br /> and 54 and 66 feet Some localized "hard pan" material was noted in these soil horizons and <br /> appear to act as confining layers between the two aquifers Further the "hard pan" material <br /> appears to be an impediment to vertical contaminant migration as confirmed by the reported <br /> clean soil samples collected from depths of 50 and 60 feet, and water sample MW-6 being free of <br /> detectable petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> A majority of the soil contamination detected was in the vicinity of the fuel tank area, near <br /> recovery well RW-1 (Figures 7 and 8) Laboratory data show low concentrations of detectable <br /> TPHg and higher concentrations of detectable MTBE in the soil column from depths of 5 feet <br /> through 27 5 feet Further, soil contamination was also detected at depths of 10 and 15 feet in <br /> monitoring wells MW-4 and MW-5 It appears the soil concentrations, which were detected <br /> within the capillary fringe, suggest the shallow aquifer may be influencing the TPHg and/or <br /> MTBE concentrations at these locations <br /> Based on the information obtained and data reviewed, CCI recommends the following <br /> 1 A Dual-Phase Extraction Test be performed on recovery well RW-1, with a truck <br /> mounted, high-vacuum, liquid-ring pump with a thermal oxidizer system will be used to conduct <br /> the test The purpose of the test will be to determine whether vapor extraction is a viable option <br /> for cleaning the soil and groundwater in the vicinity of RW-1 The Dual-Phase Extraction Test <br /> will be operated for a minimum of S hours or until it can be determined whether this remediation <br /> technique can effectively remediate the groundwater at the site Based on the results of this test, <br /> Quik Stop will select the appropriate treatment system for the site, <br /> 2 CCI is currently attempting to obtain off-site permission to install two additional wells <br />