Laserfiche WebLink
The investigation did not include collection of groundwater samples, as originally proposed in <br /> the April 21, 1997 Workplan, based on field observations and guidance from the onsite <br /> ' representative from the San Joaquin County PHS/EHD These observations are discussed in <br /> Section 5 0 <br /> 3.2.1 Collection of Soil Samples <br /> ' IT collected 14 soil samples from four locations on July 10, 1997 using the Geoprobe DPT rig <br /> These Geoprobe sample locations are shown on Figure 2 and described below <br /> ' Two of the Geoprobe sample Iocations(SDC-2 and SDC-3) were in closeroximi to the <br /> P tY <br /> ' former location of the fourth UST (second from the east) which previously exhibited the highest <br /> soil concentration of TPH-as diesel (7600 ppm) Soil samples were collected from each of these <br /> locations at 15-, 20-, and 25-feet bgs One Geoprobe boring (SDC-1) was located approximately <br /> ' 15 feet northeast of location SDC-2 and samples were obtained at 5 foot intervals to a depth of <br /> 35 feet at this location The fourth Geoprobe boring (SDC-4) was performed at the second AOC <br /> ' (the western-most UST) Samples were obtained at 5 foot intervals to a depth of 25 feet at this <br /> location Geoprobe sampling logs are provided in Appendix B <br /> From each of the Geoprobe sample locations, soil sample collection was performed using a <br /> ' pneumatically driven stainless steel sampling tool To collect the soil samples, the sampler was <br /> driven to the target depth, the piston tip retracted into a sample tube and the sample tube <br /> ' displaced by approximately 2 feet of soil The sample was then extracted from the borehole to <br /> the surface using the DPT ng The sample liner containing the sample was removed from the <br /> ' sampler, logged for hydrogeologic and lithologic characteristics by a geologist and screened <br /> using a photoionization detector All soil samples were labeled,packaged and stored in an iced <br /> cooler for transport under chain of custody manifest to a State of California certified analytical <br /> ' laboratory <br /> ' 3.2.2 Soil Sample Analyses <br /> All soil samples were submitted to Sparger Technology, Inc of Sacramento, California, a state of <br /> ' California certifier analytical laboratory (#1614) Soil samples were analyzed for TPH-diesel <br /> and benzene,toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes (BTEX) by EPA Methods 8015/8020 on a <br /> standard turn-around time of five working days The analyses were performed in accordance with <br /> ' SAC/08-29-97/ENG/7717" 5 <br />