Laserfiche WebLink
' Diamond Lumber-Manteca Quarterly Groundwater Monttonng Page 2 <br /> results detected elevated levels of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX), and total <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) On December 5, 1989, BEI installed three <br /> ' groundwater monitoring wells near the former USTs, one of these wells reportedly being installed <br /> in the former tank location The wells were advanced to depths of 25 feet, with soil samples collected <br /> at 5-foot depth intervals from each boring Elevated levels of BTEX and TPH-g were detected in <br /> both the groundwater and soil samples <br /> October 1991 <br /> SRK was retained by Diamond Lumber to address the potential extent of vertical and lateral <br /> contaminant migration from the former USTs On October 5, 1991, SRK collected groundwater <br /> samples from the three monitoring wells installed by BEI in 1989 During the site visit, it was <br /> discovered that actual location of the monitoring wells significantly differed from the well location <br /> maps provided in the BEI reports Analytical parameters for the SRK sampling event included <br /> BTEX and TPH-gas Elevated BTEX and TPH-gas concentrations were detected in the monitoring <br /> well assumed to be MW-3, while slightly elevated concentrations of these parameters were <br /> encountered in wells assumed to be MW-1 and MW-2 The BEI analyses performed in 1989 <br /> detected elevated BTEX and TPH-gas concentrations to monitoring well MW-1, and slightly elevated <br /> contaminant levels in wells MW-2 and MW-3 Because the observed well locations differed <br /> ' significantly with the BEI monitoring well location map, there is a high degree of uncertainty <br /> regarding BEI's well designation and corresponding laboratory results <br /> November 1991 <br /> During November 1991, an SRK Field Hydrogeologist supervised the placement of three monitoring <br /> ' wells and two test holes during November 18 through November 21, 1991 Permission to install a <br /> fourth monitoring well upgradient from the former USTs was not granted by the Southern Pacific <br /> Railroad at the time of the initial investigation The Southern Pacific Rail Road later issued a <br /> ' statement to SRK stating that permission to install monitoring wells on their property would not be <br /> granted in the future These monitoring wells are designated as SRK-MW1 through SRK-MW3, <br /> while the monitoring-,sells installed by BE] are designated as BEI-MW4 through BEI-MWb Figure 1 <br /> ' contains the monitoring JOLationS <br /> ' During SRK's subsurface soil and groundwater investigation, analytical soil samples were selected <br /> during the boring of each monitoring wells and test hole at depths of 15 feet (seasonal high <br /> groundwater level) and 30 feet (saturated zone) and submitted to a California certified laboratory <br /> The analytical soil parameters included TPH-gas, BTEX and total lead The constituents of BTEX <br /> and TPH-gas were not detected in any of the analytical soil samples, however, trace amounts of lead <br /> ' were detected in soil samples collected from monitoring well SRK-MW2 at depths of 15 and 30 feet <br /> Analytical groundwater parameters also included TPH-gas, BTEX, and total lead TPH-gas was not <br /> detected in any of the three monitoring wells The constituents of BTEX were not detected in <br /> monitoring wells SRK-MWI or SRK-MW3 while trace levels of bencene and xylene were detected <br /> in monitoring well SRK-MW2 Lead was detected in all three monitoring wells <br /> l <br /> The existing monitoring wells installed by BEI in 1989 were not purged or sampled, since data had <br /> been collected during the October monitoring event <br /> Steffen Robertson and Ku-sten <br />