My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012576
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
260
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545483
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012576
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2020 9:04:49 PM
Creation date
3/10/2020 10:57:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012576
RECORD_ID
PR0545483
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005939
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA MULTIMODAL STATION
STREET_NUMBER
260
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22102024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
260 S MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r, <br /> 5 <br /> r <br /> Wm. J. Hunter & Associates 2220 Loma Vista Dr. <br /> '9gistared Geologists Sacramento,CA 95825 <br /> Aroleum&Mineral Appralsers (916)972-7941 <br /> FAX(9 t 6)972-1683 <br /> May 29, 1992 <br /> Margaret Lagoria, Sr. REHS <br /> Ban Joaquin County PHS <br /> Environmental Health Division <br /> 445 North San Joaquin Street: <br /> Stockton, CA 95202 <br /> Ref: 260 So. Main Street, Manteca; Site Code 2333-1 <br /> Dear Miss Lagoria; <br /> On behalf of my cliont, Claudio Dell 'Eva, I am requesting an up- <br /> date on the status of the Manteca Bean/Golden Brain remediation <br /> project adjacent to the above property. I am particularly <br /> interested in the latest water sampling results from MW #14, <br /> which is downgradient from the Modesto Dry Ice site. Although <br /> some contamination was observed in that well in November, 1989, a <br /> later test showed it to be clean. I assume that the wells are <br /> being tested at least semi-annual y, and possibly •iftener; I <br /> would appreciate an update on laboratory results of wate, samples .. <br /> from bath MW #10 & 14. <br /> If the tests reveal that no ctntamination is present; then I do <br /> not believe that any further work is required by Mr. Deli 'Eva. <br /> Any contamination present beneath his property should have been <br /> detected in the down-gradient wells in the four years since the <br /> tank was pullrad. The value of the property does not justify the <br /> expanse of a groundwater investigation which is not needed or <br /> necessary; the monitoring wells on the adjacent site would have <br /> detected any contamination coming from the property. <br /> I would appreciate it if you would review the status of the <br /> Manteca Bean project and apprise me of the results. <br /> Sin re , <br /> i J. Hunter <br /> cc: Claudio Dell 'Eva <br /> David Russ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.