My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012576
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
260
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545483
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012576
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2020 9:04:49 PM
Creation date
3/10/2020 10:57:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012576
RECORD_ID
PR0545483
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005939
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA MULTIMODAL STATION
STREET_NUMBER
260
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22102024
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
260 S MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
399
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- <br /> _- 1Y <br /> which indicated 1.0 mg/kg, which was the detection limit. <br /> The sample from the west end, 2-West, was below detection limits <br /> for all tested constituents except '.TPH-G, which showed 77 mg/kg; <br /> the detection limit was 10 mg/kg; (refer to Table 2. ) <br /> February 17, 1959 - Thorpe Oil Co. removed an unused, empty, 550 <br /> gallon regular gasoline storage t?ssk, (see Plata III for <br /> location,) and took one (1) soil sample as required by County <br /> ' regulations. There was no evidence oi' contamination, and on odor <br /> or staining. Laboratory analysis shoVlF:d the sample to be below <br /> reporting limits for all tested components, (see Table i for <br /> details. ) <br /> June 27, 1989 - Thorpe Cil Co. submitted a Soil Re-excavation & <br /> x Resample Work Plan to re-excavate the west portion of the <br /> 6 original hale and collect 4 sidewall samples at 10' and one <br /> bottom sample at 14'; (refer to Exhibit A) <br /> July 25, 1989 - San Joaquin Local Health District responded to <br /> workplan, outlining necessary steps that must be taken; (refer to <br /> Exhibit B) <br /> t <br /> August 1, 1989 - Thorpe Cil excavated the west end of the hale <br /> that had been dug an Nov. 9, making a hale 8 feet X 8 feet X 14 <br /> feet deep;. (see Exhibit C. ) Four (4) sidewall soil samples were <br /> taken :by Canonie Laboratory personel with brass tubes on each of <br /> the walls at a depth of 10', and one (1) sample was taken from <br /> the bottom of the excavation, also by Canonie personel. Samples t <br /> were collected and transported under Draper chain of custody, s <br /> with instructions to test for BTX&E, EBD, TPH-G, & TEH (EPA � <br /> Methods 8015. & 8020,) and organic lead, (Method DHS 7420. ) The <br /> excavated. soil, (approximately 33 cubic yards,) was returned to <br /> t the hole. <br /> August ib, 1989 - Laboratory analysis an the above samples showed <br /> that BTX&E, EDB, TPH-G, and organic lead were all below reporting <br /> limits, (Table 2) <br /> September 7, 1989 - Laboratory report from Canonie Labs revealed <br /> that-, only the sidawall sample from the west side of the <br /> excavation showed detectable levels of TEPH, as tested by EPA <br /> Method 8018. That sample showed a concentration-of _-110-m <br /> — 9 - - -- <br /> wh zta reporting limit of 10 mg/kg; (Table 2) <br /> September le, 1989 The excavation was reentered again by Thorpe <br /> Cil, and another samples . was collected by Canonia Environmental <br /> µ; under Chain Df Custody at approximately the same location as the <br /> one discussed above. The instructions were to analyze the.sample <br /> r <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.