Laserfiche WebLink
ME <br /> S• Main, MW-10 & NW-1'4, showed concentrations Of <br /> closest to ?(,0 <br /> bTX&E and TPH-6 below detection ( �chibits(ie&er�,)oindicatedla zero <br /> vapor tests in the same area, Soil analyses during the <br /> line north of the subject property. <br /> drilling of the bore hales/monitari>,n wellshowed no wells <br /> concentrations of tested components in monitoring et fuel line <br /> #14, (Exhibit L. ) possible contamination jus from the J Modesto Dry <br /> which parallels tl,e railroad <br /> ithrnegativetresults.of <br /> Ice, was also investigated, <br /> groundwater in this area <br /> Item 7 states the depth to has been <br /> measured from 20 to 30 feet below the surface, {which has been <br /> verified by monitoring wells,) and that analysis of soil samples <br /> avation i <br /> o be <br /> taken during the first re-excity ooftgroundwategroundwater, <br /> contaminated. "Therefore, due to thePrOX3 M <br /> ed <br /> groundwater investigation should be pe <br /> First of all, the last sail sample taken on Sept. 18, 19Q9 <br /> tested clean, indicating that all residual contoi hlovemberanhas 7, 19889, <br /> removed. Item 6 of the a.;CPHS an lettediate source removal has <br /> referenced earlier, st=te5 ears to be <br /> taken place and residual sail contamination app <br /> ea <br /> absent.. . " <br /> on plate IX, and supported by work done at ?')9 Moffat <br /> As H,) the groundwater gradient is in a northerly <br /> Blvd. , {Exhibit esent at site ##23Z:3-1 would be <br /> direction. Any contamination pr <br /> detected in the monitoring wells t° the north, dawngrad�eQ)o from <br /> Modesto Dry Ice. The last known usage of the removed 4 <br /> was 5 or S years ago. The soils in this area have p5edvery good <br /> 1 permeability, and sufficient time should have elapsed <br /> If <br /> vertical migration of any contaminants to reach g <br /> the groundwater had been impacted, those contaminants <br /> the <br /> e <br /> ' been detected in the soil samples and monitto oring <br /> Manteca abeam/wolddetected either inrain Sit2 msoiltoryrecenthwatert ampler <br /> contamination ?� <br /> from the monitoring wells nearest to site 023333-1. It would <br /> appear that the extensive monitoring program associated with the <br /> project at <br /> ?,?g Moffat has adequately investigated the quality of <br /> the groundwater in this area• <br /> ile <br /> There are S municipal wells to the within 1/2 cityl�Wateor*Department, <br /> (Plate VI1,) and accorthis site' <br /> ding <br /> all wells are open tc aquifers below io feet.here addition to others <br /> the 14 monitoring wells discussed previously, As <br /> located adjacent to Main Street, north of itsdoesenoteappear <br /> _......_....-stated--in..the __...SAF�_f or the Manteca Bean site, ---_ <br /> _.... ... _..--- ❑tend.al.._ future._...thr-.eat.. t°.....the <br /> that there is any current dr p <br /> quality of the groundwater in this area.. <br /> a - . <br /> - -= <br />