Laserfiche WebLink
r� <br /> 4� <br /> SUMMARY: ra and residual <br /> appears to be absent, o <br /> x, All UST•s have been removed From the r of very minor extent. <br /> property, <br /> M- soil contamination pP ears, and "ny <br /> �. The UST's have not been in service for many Prated far off <br /> possible contamintion has eithe at Blvd. <br /> site. mig <br /> , • the property, beyond <br /> groundwater inve5tigatian On o <br /> 4 a ma3Gr 9 site 0233--L-IT <br /> no <br /> ,;.. Based an results o: sam les in <br /> neap-bY property which is down-gradient from <br /> P <br /> contamination was noted in either 5csi1 or g <br /> Gub]ect property- <br /> contamination a <br /> wells nearest to the ed <br /> groundwater from <br /> 4. The potential threat to <br /> fappears to have been removed- <br /> this site, if such ever ex's- , <br /> CONCLUSION: -further site assessment <br /> on all of the available data, evidence that <br /> Dared up since there is na of the <br /> appear warranted, •, Cause degradation <br /> work does not PP the future, assessment and/ar <br /> this site did, or will in Further site <br /> groundwater in the area. ear necessary. <br /> groundwater monitoring work does not app <br /> sincerely, <br /> I,a <br /> I WM. J. HUNTER & ASSOCIATES <br /> William ,7. Hunter <br /> Registered GeO109'st #860 <br /> w cc: Claudia Dell •EvaIn_. <br /> Jim Thorpe Oil, <br /> ------- -- - --A_4- - -- <br /> - 6 <br />