My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004399
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
510
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545486
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0004399
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2020 4:59:52 PM
Creation date
3/10/2020 2:59:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0004399
RECORD_ID
PR0545486
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005611
FACILITY_NAME
ROYAL OAKS SAVINGS
STREET_NUMBER
510
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
510 N MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Royal Oak Savings & Loan <br /> 510 N Main Street, Manteca, CaliforniaQuartPage 2 <br /> eHy Ground Winter Sampling Repots <br /> October, 1992 -January, 2993 <br /> Previous investigations had shown that relatively low level contamination <br /> I water had occurred. of ground <br /> AM-1, drilled in the area where the underground tank was removed, showed an nntnal <br /> concentration of 11 mg/l, and 10 months later, a concentration of 37 mg/1 of total <br /> Petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). The soil samples taken, at the time of the well <br /> installation, showed a maximum level of 4,800 mg/kg of total hydrocarbon. <br /> Wells MW 2, 3 and 4 were all installed at a later date by Harding & Lawson <br /> Associates. All were sampled initially on January 26, 1989. Monitoring Well 2 (MW- <br /> 2) showed a substantial increase from the initial sampling to the second sampling seven <br /> (7) months later. MW-3 showed a decrease to a "none detected" level and MIV-4 <br /> showed a slight increase m the benzene level. <br /> MW-5, 6 and 7 were installed in December of 1990, by WSF. Wells 5 and 6 showed <br /> "none detected" levels, and MW-7 showed significant levels of BTX&E. Minor <br /> hydrocarbon contamination was visually detected in soils at a 20 foot depth in Mw-7. <br /> After <br /> the Pump test and well development, a sampling round was conducted and all <br /> wells showed "none detected" in February of 1991. A subsequent around was taken m <br /> I March of 1991, and this round showed all wells "none detected", except Well 2. Well <br /> 2 had Benzene in it at 1.1 ppb. Groundwater gradient has been measured in several <br /> durections over the life of this project. These measuremeftts show swings from <br /> southeast to east to northeast The Regional Water Quality Control BoardWQCB) <br /> and the San Joaquin County Envmnmental Health <br /> down grachent is .northeast and had asked for a monitoorinDepartment <br /> grtwen to be tailed to the <br /> I northeast. <br /> IOn May 2, 1991, MW-8 was installed, northeast of the remedial excavation. 'Phis well <br /> was installed at the direction of the RWQCB to determine if groundwater had migrated <br /> to the northeast portion of the site. Soil and groundwater samples tested negative for <br /> BTXE and gasoline. <br /> In the July, 1991, sampling round, all wells <br /> I and MW-8) showed "ND" for BTXE and gasoline. bur,and-5, MW-6, <br /> MW-7 <br /> W 7 <br /> MW-2 and MW-7 had low levels of some compounds. The January, 1992 sampling <br /> showed low levels of Benzene and Xylene an MW-2. In the April and July, 1992 <br /> samplings, MW-2, MW-6 and MW-7 were tested. All three (3) wells showed "ND" <br /> levels for BTXE and gasoline. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.