My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005221
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
4075
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545509
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005221
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2020 7:11:44 AM
Creation date
3/10/2020 3:49:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005221
RECORD_ID
PR0545509
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002121
FACILITY_NAME
JAMAR SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
4075
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95215
APN
15726411
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
4075 E MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
z <br /> ' TIHRD QUARTER,2001 <br /> GROUNDWATER MONITORING REPORT <br /> I ' JAMAR OIL DISTRIBUTION <br /> SEPTEMBER 2001 <br /> Groundwater Sampling <br /> Prior to sampling,the wells were allowed to recharge to a minimum of 80% of their initial static <br /> ' water levels Groundwater samples were collected from each well using a new disposable bailer <br /> The samples were placed into the appropriate laboratory prepared containers,using proper sample <br /> handling and chain-of-custody(COC) protocol established by the USEPA The samples were <br /> ' labeled with the date, tune, identifying well number, stored in a cooler at 4' Centigrade or less, <br /> and transported to a state certified laboratory under completed COC documentation. <br /> ' Groundwater Analyses <br /> On July 6, 2001, depths to groundwater were measured from the top of the well casings (TOC) <br /> t using an electronic water level indicator The groundwater elevations recorded by GHH are <br /> summarized in Table 1 Each monitoring well was purged by pumping at least three well volumes <br /> ' of water Conductivity, temperature and pH were monitored while the wells were being purged <br /> Purging data were recorded on field data sheets, which are included in Appendix A. <br /> Samples were collected from each monitoring well using new Teflon disposable bailers <br /> Groundwater samples were analyzed for TPH G, TPH D,BTEX, 1,2-DCA,EDB and oxygenates <br /> using EPA Methods 8015 Modified, 8020 and 8260B,respectively The analyses were conducted <br /> by Acculabs,Inc of Davis, California, a California State certified laboratory, in accordance with <br /> state guidelines and EPA protocol Copies of the laboratory reports with COC documentation are <br /> included in Appendix B The analytical data is summarized on Figure 4 and m Table 2 <br /> SUMMARY <br /> Groundwater Flow and Gradient <br /> Based on depth to groundwater measurements taken on July 6, 2001, the depths to groundwater <br /> range from 50.26 feet below ground surface (bgs)in monrtormg well MW-1 to 60.53 feet bgs in <br /> ' MW-2 All groundwater elevations were measured to the nearest 0 01-feet relative to the <br /> surveyed top of casing elevation The elevations are based on the survey conducted by (JPCA) on <br /> August 30, 2000 The survey on August 30, 2000 was completed by setting the corner of the <br /> cement sidewalk on the southeastern corner of the store as the benchmark with an assumed <br /> elevation of 30 feet Based on the surveyed casing elevations and the measured depth to water on <br /> July 6, 2001, the groundwater elevations range from-318 3 feet in MW-5 to -32 01 feet in MW- <br /> 1 <br /> I ' S <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.