Laserfiche WebLink
Of significant interest to PHS/EHD is MW-6S&D. This monitoring well bore hole is placed approximately <br /> 45 feet south of and perpendicular to the present underground fuel tank(UST) location and perpendicular <br /> to reported ground water flow direction. This bore hole is completed as a dual nest well and is screened in <br /> two distinct intervals, 5' to 15.5'bgs as the shallow well screen interval which currently intersects static <br /> water level, and 22' to 24.97' bgs as the deeper well screen interval within the same bore hole. As <br /> referenced in Table I of this correspondence created from certified laboratory data the deeper well in this <br /> bore hole contains relatively higher concentrations of MTBE(480 ug/1) than in the interval directly above <br /> (120 µg/1). The boring logs for this bore hole display the geologists certified observations which reveal a <br /> "Sand, greenish gray, wet, fine-grained" unit from approximately 22' to 26' bgs. This predominantly <br /> sandy unit is overlain with what is reported as a"Silty clay,brown,damp" unit from approximately 5' bgs <br /> to 22' bgs. PHS/EHD staff recognize the potential for the 22' to 26' bgs unit to act as a preferential <br /> pathway for contaminant migration particularly for MTBE which displays high solubility characteristics. <br /> It is interesting to note that Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, Xylenes and Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons <br /> as gas or diesel (BTEX and TPHg&d) components have not been detected in MW-6S&D which has <br /> documented MTBE contamination at both intervals, shallow and deep, which suggests that MTBE <br /> migration is rapid in relation to BTEX and TPH migration in this hydrogeologic setting. <br /> MW-2 is approximately 10 feet north of the UST's. MTBE concentrations in ground water from MW-2 <br /> have been documented by certified laboratory analyses to reach 6,700 41 (see Table 1 attached, sample <br /> date 3/7/97). This bore hole, completed as a single monitoring well is placed perpendicular to the present <br /> underground fuel tank (UST) location and perpendicular to reported ground water flow direction. This <br /> well has recently (5/2/97) shown evidence of benzene contamination in addition to MTBE contamination. <br /> through certified laboratory analyses. <br /> MW-3 is approximately 10 feet south of the UST's and 35 feet north of MW-6S&D. MTBE <br /> concentrations in ground water from MW-3 have been documented by certified laboratory analyses to <br /> reach 20,000 ug/1 (see Table I attached, sample date 3/7/97). This bore hole, completed as a single <br /> monitoring well is placed perpendicular to the present and new underground fuel tank (UST) location and <br /> perpendicular to reported ground water flow direction. This well has recently (5/2/97) shown evidence of <br /> benzene contamination in addition to repeated MTBE contamination through certified laboratory analyses. <br /> In conjunction with data evaluation from both MW-6 and MW-3 it is evident that MTBE is migrating <br /> through preferential pathways in saturated soil units in a direction (perpendicular) other than that of <br /> reported ground water flow. <br /> MW-1, 2, 3, 4D, and 5D have been documented by certified laboratory analyses to be impacted by <br /> unidentified hydrocarbons with carbon chains greater than C14, C15, C20, and other unidentified <br /> hydrocarbons which did not appear to be diesel. As responsible party Unocal shall make a reasonable <br /> attempt to identify any and all pollutants,contaminants,or constituents which may affect current and future <br /> beneficial use of surface and groundwater at the above referenced site. <br /> Only nested well MW-7S&D in a single bore hole which are placed in a reported upgradient position <br /> approximately 55 feet east of the UST system is currently reported to be free of contaminant impact at the <br /> detection limits employed for those constituents analyzed. <br /> It is important to note that MTBE has never been reported at this site during previous investigations and <br /> Unocal has no information to refute the assumption that the repeated detection of MTBE in monitoring <br /> wells onsite is other than a new or ongoing fuel release since the station UST system was completely <br /> replaced last year. PHS/EHD staff have recommended to Unocal and their consultants that they obtain <br /> chromatograms from the laboratory which provided services during the September 1995 soil and <br /> groundwater sampling and analyses events in order to determine whether MTBE was present at these or <br /> similar concentrations in soil and groundwater prior to the UST system replacement and operation. As <br /> stated in the June 3, 1997 Supplemental Evaluation and Investigation Report by ERI, "Chromatograms are <br /> 2 <br />