Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County DIRECTOR <br /> QD N Donna Heran,REHS <br /> P <br /> O. '' C Environmental Health Department ASSISTANT DIRECTOR <br /> 600 East Main Street <br /> Laurie Cotulla,REHS <br /> a: Stockton, California 95202-3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> Carl Borgman,REHS <br /> Mike Huggins,REHS, RDI <br /> Website: www.sjgov.org/ehd Margaret Lagorio,REHS <br /> Phone: (209)468-3420 Robert McClellon,REHS <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 Jeff Carruesco,REHS, RDI <br /> Kasey Foley,REHS <br /> May 6, 2008 <br /> Eric Hetrick <br /> Conoco Phillips <br /> Risk Management & Remediation <br /> 76 Broadway <br /> Sacramento, CA 95818 <br /> Subject: 76 Service Station No. 5886 SITE CODE: 1176 <br /> 2701 March Lane <br /> Stockton, CA <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed "Quarterly Status <br /> and Remediation Summary Report — First Quarter 2008" (Report) dated April 23, 2008, and <br /> "Work Plan for Additional Off-Site Assessment, and Hydrogen Peroxide Benchscale Testing" <br /> (Work Plan) dated March 20, 2008, prepared by Secor International Inc. for the above subject <br /> site. <br /> The Report explains that TRC was monitoring and sampling a tank pit well instead of monitoring <br /> well MW3 and that this mistake has been corrected in response to the EHD letter dated <br /> December 28, 2007. <br /> The Work Plan proposes installation of three monitoring wells (MW11 D/I/S) down-gradient of <br /> monitoring wells MW9 D/I/S and constructed similar to the MW9 wells. This work is approved <br /> as adequate and necessary. <br /> The Work Plan also proposes a bench scale test to evaluate injection of hydrogen peroxide. A <br /> rational for use of the hydrogen peroxide was provided. The test as proposed appears to be <br /> adequate to evaluate the effectiveness for degrading the TPH and MTBE; however the ITRC <br /> guidance document indicates that using permanganate to determine the oxidant demand can <br /> lead to an overestimation so this should be considered. <br /> The test may be inadequate to address the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> evaluation for Waste Discharge Requirements. The following items should be considered: <br /> • Adding analyses for cadmium and barium on the soil pretest samples; <br /> • Adding analyses for pH, TDS, chloride, sulfate, nitrate, fluoride, chemical oxygen <br /> demand, aluminum, antimony, arsenic, beryllium, total chromium and hexavalent <br /> chromium on the groundwater samples; <br /> • Using results of the general mineral analyses of soil and groundwater to evaluate if <br /> naturally occurring minerals will move into or precipitate out of groundwater as a result <br /> of the injection; <br />