My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MARIPOSA
>
7367
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0508244
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2020 3:10:14 AM
Creation date
3/12/2020 10:58:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0508244
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0008013
FACILITY_NAME
RDJ FARMS
STREET_NUMBER
7367
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MARIPOSA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
92205
APN
17922004
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
7367 E MARIPOSA RD
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
GeoloykalTechnics Inc. % Page 4 <br /> Project No.: 675.2 <br /> Murray <br /> Soil Investigation Report <br /> �+ January 5, 1999 <br /> The data is summarized in Table 1 of Appendix A and the lab data reports are attached in <br /> Appendix B. Information on Ethyl Benzene and Trichlorofluoromethane from The Merck <br /> Index, Eleventh Edition, is included in Appendix B. <br /> 4.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS' <br /> 4.1 Conclusions <br /> Given the data gathered during this soil testing and presented above, Geological Technics <br /> Inc. concludes that: <br /> 1. Concrete patch, P-1, was probably a equipment footing and does not represent an <br /> environmental concern. <br /> 2. Concrete patch, P-2, contained a very low level of oil range organics. It is possible that <br /> this was a result of naturally occurring organic materials in the soil. This has been <br /> observed in high clay content soils at other sites. Solvents were not detected in this soil <br /> sample so there does not appear to be a environmental concern associated with this <br /> location. <br /> 3. The septic tank for the floor drains appear to have been used to dispose of waste products <br /> during a previous operation. Kimball Fiberglass Corp. reportedly operated at the site in <br /> the past. Much of the debris in the drains and septic tank were fiberglass pieces. <br /> 4. Diesel range petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected where the former UST was <br /> located nor was there any unnatural staining or odor. This does not represent and <br /> environmental concern. <br /> 5. The domestic well was abandoned on December 29, 1998. <br /> 4.2 Recommendations <br /> Given the conclusions listed above, Geological Technics Inc. makes the following <br /> recommendations. These recommendations stand as our proposed scope of work for the next <br /> phase of investigation. Listed below is a schedule for performing this work. <br /> Floor Drain <br /> • The floor drains inside the building should be filled with concrete so materials cannot <br /> be disposed of in them in the future. <br /> Septic Tank <br /> • The contents of the septic tank should be removed by a hazardous waste contractor <br /> • This material should be disposed of in an appropriate manner at Forward Landfill <br /> Leach Line <br /> • The leach line should be investigated to determine its nature (horizontal perforated <br /> pipe or vertical rock well) <br /> • The condition(contaminated or not) of the leach line should be investigated <br /> Sample Collection& Testing <br /> • Soil samples should be collected under the tank and under the leach line <br /> • Samples should be tested for Volatile Organic Compounds by method 8260 <br /> Report Preparation <br /> • Prepare a summary report of the findings and recommendation for further work <br /> r. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.