My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005260
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MARIPOSA
>
2431
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545532
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005260
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2020 2:05:26 AM
Creation date
3/12/2020 11:43:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005260
RECORD_ID
PR0545532
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0022329
FACILITY_NAME
BLINCO TRUCKING
STREET_NUMBER
2431
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MARIPOSA
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
17130003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
2431 E MARIPOSA RD
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> 14kTC <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> • Criterion S <br /> This alternative is estimated to effectively remediate subsurface contaminants to acceptable <br /> regulatory levels within 18 months of implementation <br /> • Criterion 6 <br /> ' The long term effectiveness for soil remediation would be good depending upon the degree of <br /> contaminant removal <br /> Criterion 7 <br /> This alternative has some minor implementabilrty problems due to the necessity of a pilot test <br /> and the tune involved to obtaining pernuts from the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution <br /> Control District (APCD) for the vapor extraction system Permitti ig could take as much as <br /> 180 days depending upon APCD work load, but is typically completed in 60 to 90 days <br /> ' • Criterion 8 <br /> Impact to the businesses during installation and other site activities will be moderate This <br /> method has been shown to be effective in similar soil types and regulatory acceptance is <br /> expected <br /> 7_3 Small Community Well Destruction and Replacement <br /> • Criterion I <br /> The small community well destruction and replacement alternative has no immediate health <br /> based risks The existing small community well would be pressure grouted with a <br /> concrete/bentomte slurry so the possibility for exposure to humans by volatilization, dust, or <br /> dermal contact with impacted sort is nunimal, with little or no fire or explosion hazard <br /> Criterion 2 <br /> This alternative would reduce the existing levels and volume of impacted soil over time by <br /> natural degradation and attenuation, but the rate of reduction is not known The possible <br /> ' nugratnon of petroleum hydrocarbons in soil caused by surface water flushing contaminants into <br /> the groundwater is mu imal due to the asphalt and concrete surface on site The groundwater <br /> gradient direction has been consistently southeast which makes it unlikely that if groundwater <br /> ' becomes impacted the plume will migrate off site in the short term <br /> • Criterion 3 <br /> This alternative would not immediately remediate soil to levels acceptable to regulatory <br /> agencies Natural degradation of residual hydrocarbons would occur over tune with no <br /> potential receptors located within a one-third mile of the site <br /> W W43041repoiU\c1oswe doc 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.