Laserfiche WebLink
437 Miner Ave <br /> Page 2 <br /> On July 6, 1994, field work was initiated which consisted of the installation of three monitoring <br /> wells (U-1 - U-3) and the drilling of five soil borings(U-1 - U-M). The results were reported on <br /> September 21 , 1994 and indicated significant soil contamination up to 19,000 ppm TPH-gas <br /> and 140 ppm Benzene at 45.5 feet below ground surface from U-L drilled in the area of the <br /> former tanks that were removed in 1967. The laboratory noted that there were some holding <br /> time violations of the soil samples collected. When monitoring well, U-2, was developed a <br /> sample was collected on July 25, 1994 and submitted for a hazardous waste bioassay test. The <br /> results did not determine that the liquid was hazardous; however, two fish did die after 48 <br /> hours in the 100 ppm duplicate sample. <br /> On December 23, 1994, PHS/EHD requested that a work plan be submitted to define the extent <br /> of on site and off site soil and groundwater contamination. PHS/EHD provided this directive <br /> after reviewing the results of two groundwater sampling events which indicated significant <br /> contamination and that the groundwater gradient direction shifted from the west to the north. <br /> On July 19, 1995, field work was initiated which consisted of the installation of four monitoring <br /> wells, U-4 - U-8, and three soil borings, U-N - U-P. Soil boring, U-P, was subsequently <br /> converted into a vapor extraction well, UV-1. <br /> In summary, the soil and groundwater contamination which has been evidenced appears to be <br /> associated with the underground storage tanks which were removed in 1967, rather than the <br /> tanks which were removed in 1992, hence the statement was made in PHS/EHD's March 18, <br /> 1997 correspondence regarding the age of the release. Since the source of new contamination <br /> to the subsurface ended in 1967, the site does not appear to have naturally attenuated within a <br /> reasonable time period. <br /> Concentrations and Mass of Remaining Soil and Groundwater Contamination <br /> The vertical extent of soil and groundwater contamination beyond 45.5 feet (U-L) is unknown. <br /> At the time that U-L was drilled groundwater levels were measured between 47 and 50 feet bgs. <br /> As indicated earlier, significant concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were evidenced at <br /> 45.5 feet bgs. Also, the total depth of the monitoring wells are 55 feet bgs with screened <br /> intervals between 30 and 55 feet bgs (U-1 - U-3) or 35 and 55 feet bgs (U-4 - U-8). The most <br /> recent groundwater levels were measured between 31 and 33 feet bgs. Between 1994 and <br /> 1997, the groundwater level at this site has risen approximately 17 feet. Despite the dilution <br /> effect of this dramatic change in groundwater depth, concentrations of 39,000 ppb TPH-gas <br /> and 2,100 ppb benzene continue to be evidenced in samples collected from U-3 downgradient <br /> of the 1967 tank pit. Since the full vertical definition of the soil and groundwater contamination <br /> is not known, it is impossible to attempt to calculate the full volume and mass of the remaining <br /> contamination; however, based on an approximate vertical extent of 48 feet and lateral area of <br /> 80 feet by 80 feet GeoStrategies estimated that there was 8,900 cubic yards of contaminated <br /> soil with 56,819 pounds of TPH-gasoline. This contamination is the result of 30 years of <br /> natural attenuation. <br /> According to the Underground Storage Regulations: California Code of Regulations, Title 23, <br /> Division 3, Chapter 16, Article 11 §2724.(3) there is evidence that contaminated soils are or may <br /> be in contact with groundwater warranting a soil and groundwater investigation. The purpose <br /> of the investigation is to assess the nature and vertical and lateral extent of the release and to <br /> determine a cost-effective method of cleanup which will be reported in a Corrective Action Plan. <br /> An aspect of the development of a Corrective Action Plan is to perform a feasibility study to <br /> select and design the most cost-effective alternative (§2725). <br />