Laserfiche WebLink
r r r � �. � �■r r r � r r ■r � � .� � <br /> LOCATION: U-23 <br /> COMPOUND = N <br /> ro <br /> Date (ug/1) WC1,111 <br /> November 2000 25 0.557.. <br /> e rua 25 0.25 <br /> May2001 25 0.25 <br /> August 25 0.25 <br /> November 2001 25 0.25 <br /> e ruar 2 25 0.25 <br /> ay 25 1 5 <br /> August2002 25 0.25 <br /> ovem er 2002 52 4.6 <br /> February 2003 25 0.25 <br /> May 25 0.25 <br /> AUPUM2003 25 0.25 <br /> November 2003 25 <br /> e ruar —2004 25 2.7, <br /> r1 63 '3.1 <br /> u ust 2004 59 ` 2.1 <br /> November 2004 25 :,1.3: <br /> February 20 54 2.5 <br /> STATISTICS <br /> Analysis Count 18 18 <br /> S 40 55 <br /> 1 Mann-Kendall P 0.071 0.02 <br /> Trend est Result at: No Trend pwar <br /> 0 confidence Trend <br /> 90% confidence Upward Upward <br /> Trend Tren <br /> 80% confidence Upward Upward <br /> Trend Trend <br /> 2 Sloe units/ r) -77 1 -9 <br /> CV 0.43 1 07 <br /> NOTES: (1) P is the probability (out of 1.0) of no significant trend (>3 analyses req'd) <br /> This value must be < 0.1 for a significant trend to exist at 90% confidence (Gilbert 1987) <br /> This value must be ¢0.2 for a significant trend to exist at 80% confidence (Gilbert 1987) <br /> Trend analysis not performd at locations where the majority of concentration values were non-detect <br /> Non-detects entered as 112 the detection limit and italicized. <br /> U-23 Table 3-4 & Appendix A mann-kendall <br />