Laserfiche WebLink
LOCATION: U-24 <br /> W <br /> M <br /> COMPOUND V N <br /> co <br /> Date (m/0— WCO) <br /> Nove mber 2000 25 0.25 <br /> February 2001 25 0.565 <br /> may nui 25 0.25 <br /> August 2001 25 0.25 <br /> November 2001 25 0.25 <br /> February 20Q2 25 0.25 <br /> May 2002 25 0.25 <br /> August 2002 25 0.25 <br /> November 2002 <br /> February 2003 25 0.25 <br /> May 2003 <br /> August 20U3 25 0.25 <br /> MoVernber 2003 <br /> February 200 <br /> Ap <br /> 7 ril 2004 _)4 430,04. <br /> August 2U04 <br /> November 2004 <br /> F <br /> ­4" 4 0 <br /> ebruary 2005 <br /> STATISTICS <br /> Analysis Count 18 18 <br /> S 65 51 <br /> (1) Mann-Kendall P 0.007 0.029 <br /> Trend Test Result at: Upward Upward <br /> 950 confidence ][rand Trend <br /> 90%confidence Upward UDward <br /> 80% confidence Upward Upward <br /> Trend Trend <br /> (2) Slope (units/yr) -77 -9 <br /> (;V F---- <br /> 9,71— 1.39 <br /> NOTES. (1) P is the probability (out of 1.0) of no significant trend (> 3 analyses req'd) <br /> This value must be <0.1 for a significant trend to exist at 90% confidence (Gilbert 1987) <br /> This value must be <0.2 for a significant trend to exist at 80% confidence (Gilbert 1987) <br /> Trend analysis not performd at locations where the majority of concentration values were non-detect <br /> Non-detects entered as 1/2 the detection limit and italicized. <br /> U-24 Table 3-4 & Appendix A mann-kendall <br />