My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MENDOCINO
>
1081
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545548
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/4/2020 10:00:49 AM
Creation date
3/16/2020 4:29:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0545548
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0001143
FACILITY_NAME
UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC
STREET_NUMBER
1081
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
MENDOCINO
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95211
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1081 W MENDOCINO AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\wng
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WORKPLAN FOR ADDITIONALC�OUNDWATER ASSESSMENT <br /> and the City of Stockton Fire Department(#00-91). The former UST location is now beneath a <br /> newly paved staff and student parking lot(Figure 2). <br /> The soil sampling and analysis completed when the UST was removed identified concentrations <br /> of MTBE in the subsurface soil. Upon obtaining soil sample results following the UST removal, <br /> SJCEHD requested that UOP conduct an investigation to determine the lateral and vertical extent <br /> of soil and groundwater potentially impacted by MTBE. On behalf of UOP,ESA submitted the <br /> Soil Investigation Workplan to the SJCEHD on June 8, 2000 for review, and UOP received <br /> workplan approval from Ms. Carol Oz(SJCEHD)on June 19,2000. With assistance of a direct- <br /> push soil-sampling rig,ESA obtained soil and groundwater samples from various sampling <br /> locations on July 5,2000 in accordance with that workplan and prepared the Subsurface Soil and <br /> Groundwater Assessment Report,dated August 25,2000. In that document, ESA reported that <br /> one soil sample obtained from soil boring TP-4 at 15 feet bgs had a concentration of 11 parts per <br /> billion(ppb)of MTBE. Laboratory analysis did not identify concentrations above the detection <br /> limits for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline(TPH-g)or benzene,toluene,ethylbenzene <br /> and xylene(BTEX). Of the five groundwater samples analyzed, only two concentrations of <br /> MTBE were detected: 1,300 ppb in soil boring TP-4, and 1.4 ppb in TP-5. Based on these <br /> v <br /> findings,ESA concluded that the MTBE impact to groundwater was localized with minimal <br /> lateral extent. <br /> The SJCEHD responded to the Subsurface Soil and Groundwater Assessment Report in a letter <br /> received September 18, 2000 and requested that a workplan be submitted to further evaluate and <br /> define the contaminated groundwater at the former UST site. On behalf of UOP,ESA met with <br /> the SJCEHD on October 10, 2000 to propose a phased approach to assess the extent of MTBE in <br /> the groundwater. ESA has prepared this workplan based on previous discussions with the <br /> SJCEHD. <br /> SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PLAN <br /> The objective of this phase of investigation,as proposed under this workplan, is intended to <br /> further define the extent of MTBE in the groundwater near the former UST. ESA will <br /> accomplish this by completing two tasks: 1)a literature search to determine, from previous <br /> investigative work,the typical groundwater flow direction and gradient in the site vicinity, and <br /> 2)groundwater sampling and analysis. <br /> �r <br /> The two proposed tasks should provide information to determine the direction of groundwater <br /> flow and concentrations of MTBE in a contaminant plume,if one is present. The findings of this <br /> additional assessment will determine the need for further investigative work such as groundwater <br /> well installation, sensitive receptor surveys, and utility surveys. For example,if the groundwater <br /> sampling indicates a significant MTBE plume,then the installation of monitoring wells and a <br /> survey of underground utility trenches may be warranted. The need for additional phases of <br /> assessment work will be assessed in the report prepared as part of this workplan. <br /> v <br /> v <br /> Environmental Science Associates 2 University of rhe Pacific <br /> November 2000 Workplan For Additional Site Assessment <br /> 200252 <br /> y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.