Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> ' 08 March 2004 <br /> • AGE-NC Project No 98-0432 <br /> ' Page 2 of 4 <br /> Temperature, pH and conductivity of the purged water were measured at regular purge-volume <br /> intervals with an Oakton water analyzer Monitoring well field logs are included in Appendix Amo JYVV <br /> y�� <br /> Purge water generated from the site monitoring wells was contained on-site in appropriately labeled <br /> ' 55-gallon drums <br /> ' 22 COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Ground water samples were collected from the monitoring wells using the disposable polyethylene <br /> ' bailers, these bailers were disposed of after one use and require no decontaminating, thereby <br /> minimizing cross contamination due to sampling devices Each water sample was transferred into <br /> three 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing 0 5 ml 18% HCl as a <br /> ' sample preservative and into one 1-liter amber bottle without preservative After collection, the <br /> samples were labeled and placed in a chilled container for transportation under chain-of-custody to <br /> Cal Tech Environmental Laboratory(CTEL), a California Department of Health Services (DHS)- <br /> certified analytical laboratory located in Paramount, California Each sample was analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) in <br /> ' . accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified, <br /> • Benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) and fuel additive compounds, <br /> ' including di-isopropyl ether(DIPE),ethyl-tertiary-butyl ether(ETBE),methyl-tertiary-butyl <br /> ether (MTBE), tertiary-amyl methyl ether (TAME), and tertiary-butanol (TBA), 1,2- <br /> dichloroethane (1,2-DCA), ethyl dibromide (EDB)eA 1,2-dibromoethane) in accordance <br /> ' with EPA Method 8260B <br /> ' 3 0. FINDINGS <br /> ' Ground water elevation, flow direction and gradient were determined from field data collected in <br /> February 2004,the contaminant impact to ground water was quantified by the ground water sample <br /> laboratory analytical data <br /> 3 1 GROUND WATER ELEVATION, FLOW DIRECTION AND GRADIENT <br /> ' The depth to ground water measured in the monitoring wells ranged from 17 11 to 18 83 feet below <br /> the top of the well casing (btoc) (Table 1) The ground water elevations at the site ranged from <br /> ' 18 q1 feet (MW-7) to 19 46 feet (MW-3) above mean sea level (MSL), the average ground water <br /> elevation decreased 2 feet since the previous monitoring event in July 2003 <br /> �� 1 Advanced GeoEnvlronmental,Inc <br />