My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005125
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOFFAT
>
229
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545566
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005125
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/23/2020 11:07:15 PM
Creation date
3/17/2020 4:47:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005125
RECORD_ID
PR0545566
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005479
FACILITY_NAME
MANTECA BEAN CO
STREET_NUMBER
229
STREET_NAME
MOFFAT
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
229 MOFFAT BLVD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
y rl <br /> Second Quarter 1996 Status Report 2 <br /> Golden Grain Company, Manteca Bean Facility,229 Moffat Boulevard, Manteca,CA June 14, 19% <br /> The depth to water measurements recorded on May 21, 1996, were used to calculate the <br /> groundwater elevations for preparation of a potentiometric surface map for the site (figure 2) The <br /> depth to water measurement from MW-3 was not used because a bent well casing did not allow an <br /> accurate measurement The potentiometric surface elevations measured on May 21, 1996, showed <br /> an average increase of approximately 1 foot since the February 20, 1996, monitoring event The <br /> groundwater gradient direction beneath the site is generally to the north at an average gradient of <br /> 0 0017 foot per foot The general gradient at the southern portion of the site is slightly greater than <br /> that for the northern portion <br /> GROUNDWATER SAMPLING <br /> Groundwater samples were collected from all of the 14 monitoring wells on site in accordance <br /> with the LUFT guidelines A copy of the field data sheet for monitoring well gauging and <br /> sampling work is included In attachment 3 The samples were submitted under chain-of-custody <br /> protocol to American Environmental Network in Pleasant Hill, California, for chemical analyses <br /> The samples were analyzed for benzene,toluene, ethylbenzene, and total xylenes (BTEX), and <br /> for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g) using Environmental Protection Agency <br /> (EPA) Methods 50301801518020 Historic and recent groundwater analytical data are <br /> . summarized in table 2 The laboratory analytical reports and the chain-of-custody record for the <br /> water samples collected on May 21, 1996, are included in attachment 4 Maps showing reported <br /> values of dissolved TPH-g and benzene concentrations are included in attachment 1 as figures 3 <br /> and 4, respectively <br /> Of the 14 monitoring wells sampled in May 1996, dissolved concentrations of TPH-g and benzene <br /> were detected in wells MW-1, MW-4, MW-5, and MW-7 The dissolved TPH-g concentrations <br /> detected in groundwater samples from MW-1, MW-4, and MW-7 were lower than the results reported <br /> for the previous quarterly sampling performed on February 20, 1996, but within historic ranges <br /> Concentrations of TPH-g detected in groundwater samples from MW-5 were slightly higher than the <br /> results reported in the previous quarter Benzene concentrations detected in the groundwater <br /> sample from MW-1 was lower than the results from the previous quarter Concentrations of benzene <br /> detected in groundwater samples collected from MW-4, MW-5 and MW-7 were slightly higher, but <br /> within historic ranges Concentrations of dissolved TPH-g and benzene in the sample collected from <br /> MW-2 were not detected above the method detection limit this quarter Due to a matrix interference, <br /> however, the detection limits for dissolved TPH-g and benzene were elevated for this sample This <br /> is caused by elevated levels within the sample of other target compounds in the analytical method <br /> (EPA 8020-see lab report for MW-2) Historically, MW-2 has had detectable concentrations of <br /> dissolved TPH-g and benzene <br /> • <br /> 42=13 QS2 <br /> F4u001 ®AR11ML GTI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.