My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005069
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOFFAT
>
466
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545571
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005069
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/15/2020 10:27:39 PM
Creation date
3/18/2020 3:36:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005069
RECORD_ID
PR0545571
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003570
FACILITY_NAME
BOBS MUFFLER & RADIATOR
STREET_NUMBER
466
STREET_NAME
MOFFAT
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22104019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
466 MOFFAT BLVD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
18 April 2001 - <br /> AGE-NC Project No_ 98-0520 <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br /> container and transported under chain-of-custody to McCambell Analytical,Inc.(MAI)The samples <br /> ' were-analyzed for: <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) in accordance with EPA <br /> tMethod 5030/8015M; <br /> • Volatile aromatic compounds - benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene and xylene (BTEX) with <br /> methyl tertiary-butyl ether(MTBE) - in accordance with EPA Method 8020; and <br /> ' Fuel oxygenates,Including tertdi-Isopropyllarybutanol(TBA), ether DIPE),ethyl tert-butyl <br /> ether (ETBE), tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME), and MTBE, with 1,2-Dichl6roethane <br /> (1,2-DCA) in accordance with EPA Method 8260B. <br /> After purging and water sampling event at each well the two-stage pump was cleaned in an Alconox <br /> ' solution and rinsed prior to preceding to the next well. <br /> 3.0. FINDINGS <br /> .Ground water elevation, and flow direction were calculated from field data;hydrocarbon-impact to .. <br /> ground water was inferred from laboratory analysis of ground water samples. <br /> t .3.1. GROUND WATER ELEVATION AND GRADIENT <br /> The relative elevation of groundwater in each well was calculated by subtracting the depth to ground <br /> ' <br /> water.from the surveyed relative casing elevations-(Table 1). Depths to ground water ranged from <br /> 16.95 feet to 17.72 feet below the tops of the well casings.Ground water elevations at the site ranged <br /> ' from 19.29 feet (MW-3) to 19.40 feet(MW-4) above mean sea level. <br /> The ground water flow direction was determined using ground water elevation data. The ground ` <br /> ' water table underlying the site forms a trough-like depressi6n this quarter,with the base of the trough <br /> plunging'northwest under an average gradient of 0.0008 ft/ft.The northern limb of the trough flows . <br /> west-southwest;the southern limb's flow direction is north-northeast.At such a low gradient,small <br /> ' measurement variations can greatly affect the,inferred flow direction. Figure.2 illustrates the <br /> contoured ground water elevations as measured on 16 March 2001. <br /> 3,2, ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES, <br /> ' TPH-g was detected in all the water samples analyzed at concentrations ranging from' 560 . <br /> micrograms per liter (gg/1)in MW-4 to 11,000 µg/1 in MW-5. <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.