My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005088
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOFFAT
>
466
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545571
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2020 1:42:05 AM
Creation date
3/18/2020 4:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005088
RECORD_ID
PR0545571
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003570
FACILITY_NAME
BOBS MUFFLER & RADIATOR
STREET_NUMBER
466
STREET_NAME
MOFFAT
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22104019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
466 MOFFAT BLVD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
11 February 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0520 _ <br /> Page 13 of 21 <br /> ' Therefore, even though anaerobic biodegradation is much slower than aerobic biodegradation, <br /> anaerobic processes may dominate the degradation of contaminants. <br /> ' Naturai attenuation is normally used where low,concentrations of hydrocarbons are present, after <br /> completion of another method of remediation, or in an area where no domestic or irrigation wells <br /> are threatened. <br /> ' The natural attenuation process is usually time consuming;• it can take man ears for the <br /> Y. Y <br /> hydrocarbon plume to reach levels comparable to those of active remediation methods. Costs for <br /> natural attenuation are definitely lower than the active remediation options, however, the periodic. <br /> costs could accumulate over time and potentially be considerable depending on the duration and type <br /> of monitoring requirements. <br /> Fate and Transport modeling may be used to demonstrate that hydrocarbons in soil do not pose a <br /> threat to ground water. Where ground water has been impacted modeling may be used to evaluate <br /> the possibility'of hydrocarbons to impact nearby ground water receptors. <br /> ' • 7.0. GROUND WATER REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES <br /> AGE believes that ground water extraction, In--situ air sparging, In-situ <br /> bioremediation/bioenhancement, and natural attenuation are appropriate remedial technologies or. ' <br /> strategy to consider to address hydrocarbon-impacted ground water on'the subject site. <br /> 7.1. GROUND WATER EXTRACTION <br /> There are several different methods for treatment of extractedound water, which are collectively <br /> � � y <br /> called "pump and treat". As the name indicates, all methods involve extraction and transfer of <br /> contaminated ground water from the aquifer to an above-ground treatment or disposal/recycling <br /> ' facility. The extraction is performed using an automatic pump system to maintain capture <br /> characteristics in the aquifer and to assure that process volume requirements are maiintained. After <br /> treatment, the water is usually discharged into a sanitary sewer. <br />' 7.1.1. Ground Water Treatment Methods <br /> The documented presence of dissolved hydrocarbons will require treatment for the recovered water. <br /> Two of the most common methods of water treatment are air stripping and carbon adsorption. Air <br /> stripping involves removal of volatile organic compounds from ground water by'promoting the <br /> transfer of contaminants from the dissolved phase to the vapor phase. The process usually works <br /> Advanced GeoEnviron mental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.