My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005088
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MOFFAT
>
466
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545571
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0005088
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2020 1:42:05 AM
Creation date
3/18/2020 4:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0005088
RECORD_ID
PR0545571
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003570
FACILITY_NAME
BOBS MUFFLER & RADIATOR
STREET_NUMBER
466
STREET_NAME
MOFFAT
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
22104019
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
466 MOFFAT BLVD
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
' 11 February 20.03 <br /> " <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 98-0520 <br /> Page 14'of 21 <br /> well with volatile organic compounds,but less successfully with longer-chained hydrocarbons,such <br /> ' as commonly occur in diesel fuel. Carbon adsorption utilizes granular activated carbon to simply <br /> f "filter" organic compounds out of ground water. <br /> A third, but less common method of above-ground treatment of wateris is bioremediation. <br /> Contaminated ground water is "treated" by adding hydrocarbon-degrading microbes or by <br /> augmenting natural hydrocarbon degradation activities with the introduction of nutrients. <br /> ' 7.1.2. Feasibility Testing <br /> Aquifer testing has not been performed at the site; Site-specific testing would have to be performed <br /> prior to initiation of a pump and treat method. At the present time, ground water elevation is at <br /> approximately 24 feet bsg, within the less permeable, 15-foot thick clayey silt Iayer that is <br /> sandwiched between overlying and underlying sands. r <br /> There are several disadvantages to "pump and treat"methods, which include: 1) extended cleanup <br /> periods, resulting in increased total costs, although the maintenance for this method is relatively <br /> ' • cost-effective and 2) regulatory cleanup goals are difficult to attain, mostly due to persistent <br /> hydrocarbons detected during subsequent sampling events. <br /> ' This technology is useful for hydraulic control to prevent-spreading of the contaminant plume. <br /> Minimizingwater disposal costs will significantly increase feasibility of this method. <br /> 7.1.3. Duration <br /> ' Experience has shown that all systems involving ground d water extraction require much more time <br /> than would be anticipated from aquifer tests and calculations of ground water discharge rates, and <br /> ' the method seldom achieves regulatory goals for ground water clean-up. Systems typically operate <br /> for several years.During this time,pumps and other equipment may need replacement several times. <br /> 7.1.4. Cost <br /> ' Ground water extraction is usually a very costly method of ground water treatment. Costs for <br /> installation of a "pump and treat" system typically ranges from $30,000 to $50,000, including the <br /> installation of large-diameter extraction wells. Once extracted, the contaminated water must be <br /> 1 treated or disposed. Treatment is highly dependant upon the concentrations -of dissolved <br /> hydrocarbons in the ground water; the cost per gallon couldbe as great as $2 based on the <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.