Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br /> } <br /> AC'11Qt1� 'r.1 i CI;F1E11DED AFTER WELL COMM Ei 1()fi 1iill7 <br /> After the rasAsl is of t:1 c• sc i 1 _cr.l •rater amt, r tea+-irr=i gave <br /> been a[calysed, a follow-up x'eport shoul:i be prepared that <br /> vrillt:;.)w geulnJrc sectinr,� prepared from the boring logs, <br /> alutig with ttte sample results. <br /> If thE.. monitoring well water zampl[:s all show no evidence of <br /> contamination, it could be concluded `-1tat none exists, <br /> regardless of the: direction of water flow. the monitoring <br /> well adjacent to the forme:: tank site should be proof of <br /> that. If contamination is found, as noted above, or[e or [[lore <br /> ocher sionitoring wells off-site might then be needed to <br /> delineate the: direction of the: contaminate plume. If <br /> proves to be the case, na further action- should be taken <br /> until a discussion has been held with the EHD and the <br /> Regional Water Quality control Euard. <br /> If no contaminate; are found in the three wells, they <br /> should be resampled on a quarterly basis for one year <br /> determine if pollutants <br /> (through one rainy season) , to <br /> that might be present in the current vadose zone have been <br /> leaches: and/or migrated to the water table. <br /> Dennis R. Allen <br /> Certified Engineering Geologist, # 169 ...{[ <br /> tiT <br /> hoc U. <br /> 4 <br /> 'S <br /> tF <br /> i <br /> { ` <br /> ..r Rao <br /> Ez <br /> JIM BIKINI �i <br /> k <br /> k{Y <br /> t <br /> .r <br /> a> <br /> �Ii <br />