Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> billion (ppb) in well MWi to 100,000 ppb in well MW3 Concentrations of benzene ranged from <br /> 3,200 ppb in well MW1 to 19,000 ppb in well MW2 Groundwater samples collected from wells <br /> MW1, MW2, and MW3 contained no detectable concentrations of oxygenate fuel additives <br /> Analytical results of groundwater samples are summarized in Table 3 <br /> ' The groundwater sample collected from well DW contained detectable concentrations of BTEX <br /> Benzene was the only constituent that exceeded the State of California Maximum Contaminant <br /> Level (MCL) Trace amounts of four other constituents were also detected above the Method <br /> Detection Limit (MDL), but these results are below the Practical Quantitation Limit (PQL) <br /> Because the results for the four other constituents were below the PQL, these results can not be <br /> ' accurately defined All other volatile organic constituents analyzed were nondetectable Mr <br /> Hanan Fradkin confirmed in a conversation with ATC on January 13, 1999, that the water from <br /> well DW was being used to wash equipment and machinery, but was not being utilized as a source <br />' of drinking water The site's drinking water is provided by a bottled water company <br /> 5.0 WELL SURVEY <br /> 1 ATC reviewed Department of Water Resources (DWR) groundwater well construction logs and <br /> conducted a site walk in the vicinity of the site to identify groundwater wells located within <br /> 2,000-foot radius of the site The search revealed thirteen wells located within approximately <br /> 2,000 feet of the site Two of the thirteen wells are located within approximately 500 feet of the <br /> site The well locations are shown on Figure 4 <br />' The wells were located on the map according to "well location" description information provided <br /> on the well construction logs Available well construction logs are contained in Appendix E The <br />' groundwater gradient is to the southwest <br /> Two wells located on the south side of Munford Road (Wells Nos 5 and 6, Appendix E) are the <br /> closest to the site(within approximately 500 feet south) According to the well log, Well No 5 is <br /> approximately 142 feet deep and supplies drinking water to the residence at 3606 Munford Road <br /> The well is not screened Because this well is located crossgradient to downgradient from the <br /> isite, it is ATC's judgment that it is possible, but unlikely, that the well has been impacted or is <br /> threatened by petroleum hydrocarbons from the site According to the well log, Well No 6 is 205 <br />' deep and supplies drinking water The well is screened from 160 to 200 feet below ground <br /> surface (bgs) Although this well is screened at a deeper interval, due to the fact that this well is <br /> located crossgradient to downgradient from the site, it is ATC's judgment that it is possible, but <br />' unlikely, that the well has been impacted or is threatened by petroleum hydrocarbons from the <br /> site <br /> Four wells are located downgradient from the site, but these wells located approximately 1,000 <br />' feet from the site (Well Nos 1, 2, 3, and 4, Appendix E) All four wells supply drinking water to <br /> the facilities at their locations Three of the wells are not screened (Well Nos 1, 3, and 4) Well <br /> No 2 is screened from 190 to 240 feet bgs Because these wells are located approximately 1,000 <br /> w 116393`reports\swni doc 5 <br /> I <br />