Laserfiche WebLink
ti <br />' 08 August 2005 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 98-0534 <br />' Page 10 of 15 <br /> `S <br /> • 28 January 2005-ground water levels measured at MW-1 through MW-8 averaged 8 6 feet <br />' below the tops of the well casings (above yet near the screened interval) On 17 February, <br /> monitoring well MW-9 was purged and sampled for the chemicals of concern All <br /> monitoring wells were accessible during the monitoring event,the calculated ground water <br /> flow direction was Inferred to be northeast across the former UST area at a gradient of 0 02 <br /> ft/ft TPH-d and BTEX compounds were not detected In the ground water samples collected <br /> from the wells Hydrocarbons and fuel additives were not detected in the sample from <br /> monitoring well MW-9 TPH-g was detected in the ground water samples collected from <br /> well MW-4 at a concentration of 100µg/1,detected in the ground water samples MTBE was <br />' detected by EPA Method 8260 In the samples from wells MW-4, MW-6 and MW-8 at <br /> concentrations of 25 µg/l, 7 4 µg/l and 2 1 µg11 , respectively <br /> No other fuel oxygenates were detected In any of the samples Ground water elevations are <br /> summarized in Table 3, analytical results of ground water samples are summanzed in <br /> Table 4 <br />' 01 April 2005-On 01 April 2005,monitoring well MW-9 was sampled TPH-g,TPH-d and <br /> BTEX compounds and fuel additives Including MTBE were not detected In the ground water <br />' 0 sample collected from the well Ground water data Is summarized in Table 3, analytical <br /> results of ground water samples are summarized in Table 4 <br />' • 15 June 2005 - ground water levels were measured at wells MW-1 through MW-9 and <br /> averaged 9 5 feet below the tops of the well casings(above,yet near the screened Interval), <br /> the ground water was Inferred to be flowing to the north across the former UST area at a <br />' calculated gradient of 0 017 ft/ft TPH-d and BTEX compounds were not detected in the <br /> ground water samples collected from the wells Hydrocarbons and fuel additives were not <br /> detected In the sample from monitoring well MW-9 TPH-g was detected in the ground water <br /> I samples collected from wells MW-4 and MW-6 at a concentration of 100 µg/1 and 120µg/l, <br /> respectively MTBE was detected In the samples from wells MW-3 though MW-6 at Cyd9 <br /> concentrations of from 5 5 µg/1 to 130 µg/l, respectively No other fuel oxygenates were <br /> YYX <br />' detected in any of the samples Ground water elevations are summarized in Table�' <br /> analytical results of ground water samples are summarized in Table 4 Field data logs are <br /> provided in Appendix C The laboratory report(CTEL Project No CT214-0506150),quality <br /> assurance/quality control report and chain of custody form are Included in Appendix D <br /> GeoTracker confirmation pages of the submitted laboratory electronic deliverable format <br /> (EDF) files are included in Appendix E <br /> r <br /> 24 REGIONAL GEOLOGIC SETTING <br /> . The site is located within the northern San Joaquin Valley which comprises part of the Great Valley <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />