Laserfiche WebLink
. ' <br /> Messrs. Vais and Tuck <br /> Page 2 <br /> 1) (Page 2-9, Section 2 . 3) The first sentence states: "For <br /> the purposes of price projection for this solicitation, <br /> the type and number of soils analyses is described <br /> below. " Information concerning the number of soil <br /> analyses is not included in the Work Plan. <br /> 2) (Page A-3 , Section A. 3 . 1) The first sentence states: <br /> "Ary soils identified as havina metals concentrations <br /> above TTLC will be treated. " The Department understands <br /> that all soils with metal concertrations above TTLC will <br /> be landfilled in a Class I Hazardous Waste Landfill. <br /> 3) (Page A-5, Section A. 4 .2 . 1) This section refers to the <br /> number and location of soil cleanup level confirmation <br /> samples and references Section A. 4 . 2 . 3 for further <br /> details. However, the next section starts with A-5 for <br /> Soil Fixation and Disposal. Section A. 4 . 2 . 2 & A. 4 . 2 . 3 is <br /> not included in the Work Plan. <br /> 4) (Page B-2, Figure B-1) The Class I Storage area should <br /> be switched with the Class III Storage area to avoid any <br /> possible hazardous soil cross-contamination. <br /> 5) [Site Safety Plan] (Page C-7, Section 4 . 0) The statement <br /> that: "Due to the nature of the work, the potential <br /> exposure of field personnel to any of the hazards is not <br /> expected to be significant. " is inaccurate. Excavation <br /> causes dust to be raised in large quantities. The Site <br /> Safety Officer must implement daily periodic personal air <br /> monitoring for airborne heavy metal contaminants prior to <br /> any visual observation of suspended dust. <br /> 6) (Page C-8 , Section 5. 0) Excavation inside the building <br /> potentially constitutes a confined space work situation. <br /> The ventilation and fan must be capable of removing all <br /> dangerous air contaminants. Consideration must also be <br /> given to emergency ingress/egress and noise monitoring. <br /> 7) (Page C-8 , Section 6. 0) The statement that: "Because <br /> of the relatively low hazard associated with the work <br /> to be performed, dividing the site into the customary <br /> exclusion, contamination reduction, and support areas <br /> is unnecessary. " is inaccurate. This site is a known <br /> hazardous waste site and the layout must be changed to <br /> include one entrance and exit to the work area with the <br />