My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�� California Re$onal Water Quality Antrol Board <br /> \® <br /> Chair Gray Davis <br /> Central Valley Region <br /> � ;. <br /> Robert Schneider, <br /> Governor <br /> Winston H.Hickoz Sacramento Main Office <br /> Secretaryfor internet Address: http://,w .swmb.ca.gov/rwgcb5 <br /> Environmental <br /> 003 <br /> Protection 3443 RouPhon°(9California <br /> 16)255 3000•FAX(9 6)255 3015827 3 <br /> 12 March 2001 <br /> ITEMS TO BE INCLUDED IN A <br /> FEASIBILITY STUDY/REMEDIAL OPTIONS EVALUATION REPORT <br /> The outline below is a minimum requirement for items to be included and discussed in the text of all <br /> feasibility studies/remedial option evaluation reports <br /> civil engineeitted to the r registered Reports certifiede signed by <br /> a registered geologist, certified engineering geologist, <br /> of California. <br /> 1. Purpose of Feasibility Study/Remedial Options Evaluation <br /> 11. Background <br /> A. Description of Facility <br /> B. Site History <br /> 1. Years of Operation <br /> 2. Chemical Use <br /> 3. Chemical Releases (Potential and Documented) <br /> C. Geology <br /> 1. Regional <br /> 2. Local, soil type, lithology, lateral extent of lithologic units <br /> D. Hydrogeology <br /> 1. Aquifers, Aquitards,Perched Aquifers <br /> 2. Groundwater flow rates, directions,recharge, discharge <br /> 3. Groundwater Use <br /> 4. Extraction and injection wells affect on groundwater flow <br /> E. Surface Water <br /> 1. Losing or gaining streams,ponds etc. <br /> 2. Hydraulic connection with aquifers <br /> F. Local Land Use <br /> G. Previous Investigation and Remedial Actions <br /> 11. Nature and Extent of Contamination <br /> A. Contaminants in Soils <br /> 1. Types and Concentrations <br /> 2. Lateral and Vertical Extent <br /> B. Contaminants in Groundwater <br /> 1. Types and Concentrations <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> pia Recycled Paper <br /> The energy challenge facing California is real. Every Californian needs to take immediate action to reduce energy consumption. <br /> For a list of simple ways you can reduce demand and cut your energy costs,see our Web-site at http:/Iwww.swrcb.ca.gov/mgcb5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.