My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Rob Donovan -2 - • 12 March 2003 ' <br /> 5. The isoconcentration maps need to show all contour lines. Several isoconcentration maps <br /> contour to 1,000 parts per billion(ppb), and the next contour line is less than 50 ppb or less than <br /> 0.5 ppb. <br /> 6. Isoconcentration maps must reflect reported concentrations. Examples of discrepancies are: <br /> • Figure 7 has a value of 6,420 ppb on the 10,000 ppb contour line; <br /> • Figure 8 has a value of 11 ppb contoured inside the 100 ppb contour line; <br /> • Figure 9 has a value of 1,700 ppb contoured inside the 5,000 ppb contour line; <br /> • Figure 14 has an 11,000 ppb concentration not contoured; <br /> • Figure 18 has a value of 369 contoured closer to the 100 contour line than a 268 value; <br /> • Figure 18 has a value of<1,000 within the<50 contour line; and <br /> • Figure 22 has a value of<2,000 outside the<50 contour line. <br /> By 9 April 2001, please provide a work plan to delineate the lateral and vertical extent of groundwater <br /> contamination at the site, define the lateral extent of water-bearing zone D, and provide an evaluation of <br /> remedial alternatives prepared in general accordance with the attached Items To Be Included In A <br /> Feasibility Study/Remedial Options Evaluation Report. If you have any questions, you may contact me <br /> at (916) 255-3119. <br /> DEVRA LEWIS <br /> Environmental Specialist II <br /> Attachment <br /> cc: Ms. Margaret Lagorio, San Joaquin County Public Health Services, Stockton <br /> Mr. Jay Jahangire, Port of Stockton, Stockton <br /> Mr. Ralph Moran,Arco Products Company, La Patina <br /> Ms. Ann Duarte-Wilkinson, Time Oil Company, WA <br /> Mr. Kyle Mullins, ST Services, TX <br /> Ms. Jill Jefferson, Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P., Orange <br /> Mr. Steve McDonald, Luce, Forward,Hamilton, and Scripps, San Diego <br /> Mr. Steve Lofholm, IT Group, Sacramento , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.