Laserfiche WebLink
• Corporation <br /> ember of The IT Croup <br /> Ms. Devra Lewis Project 812717 <br /> April 9, 2001 <br /> Page 3 <br /> IT proposes to defer the installation of additional downgradient wells and proceed with <br /> installing the proposed wells that are situated downgradient of the main plume boundary and <br /> upgradient of CPT/1-100-16. The groundwater analytical results from these wells will be used <br /> to evaluate the validity of the analytical results at CPT/H00-16. <br /> The STTC would like to defer the installation of additional upgradient groundwater <br /> monitoring wells. The wells that are requested north of the site and northwest of monitoring <br /> well TO/WC-1M and PS/P-29 are both upgradient of the source areas. Historical records <br /> show that benzene was detected in groundwater samples at two upgradient CPT locations at <br /> concentrations of 0.6 and 2.7 gg/L during the Interim Pollution Assessment conducted by <br /> EMCON in 1993. Petroleum hydrocarbons were not detected in groundwater samples <br /> collected from a CPT located north of the ARCO terminal during the Phase II Pollution <br /> Investigation Assessment, (EMCON, 1994). Benzene was periodically detected in <br /> groundwater samples from upgradient well PS/MW-IM at concentration near the lower <br /> detection limit. The RWQCB consented to eliminating this well from the quarterly <br /> groundwater monitoring program in December 1998. <br /> The historical groundwater analytical data shows that the petroleum hydrocarbons have not <br /> migrated upgradient from the source areas. <br /> 5. The isoconcentration maps need to show all contour lines. Several isoconcentration maps <br /> contour to 1,000 parts per billion (ppb), and the next contour line is less than 50 ppb or less <br /> than 0.5 ppb. <br /> The concentration gradients for many of the constituents are low at several of the terminal <br /> boundaries and decrease significantly toward the interiors of the site. We chose to use these <br /> contour intervals because we can best account for irregularities in the concentration gradients <br /> and best portray the lateral distribution of the various constituents. We considered using a <br /> logarithmic scale in areas with steep concentration gradients but found that we would loose <br /> much of the detail. We also hand contour each of these maps instead of using a contouring <br /> program(i.e., Surfer"11) so that we can better account for some of the irregular concentration <br /> gradients. Additional contour-intervals will be difficult to fit on the map and will likely <br /> obscure important site features. <br /> 6. Isoconcentration maps must reflect reported concentrations. Examples of discrepancies area <br /> • Figure 7 has a value of 6,420 ppb on the 10,000 ppb contour line; <br /> Benzene was reported at a concentration of 6,420 gg/L in the A-Zone groundwater sample <br /> at CPT/H00-05. This result was plotted near the 10,000 gg/L concentration contour <br /> because we were inferring a steep concentration gradient in this area due to separate phase <br /> hydrocarbons detected in the adjacent well TO/MW-1. <br /> • Figure 8 has a value of II ppb contoured inside the 100 ppb contour line; <br /> tT CORPORAT/ON <br /> SAC:\C^My DocumentsTroimts\Pon of StocktomCPT HP Study\Response to Comments.doc-Mit:1 <br /> 812717 <br />