My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• STATE OF CALIFORNIA - Environmental Pr14;on Agency PETE WILSON, Governor <br /> CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH <br /> 3443 Routier Road, Suite A PERIAFT SERVICE 1t <br /> Sacramento, CA 95827-3098 <br /> PHONE: (916) 255-3000 94 DEC -5 pM- 1. 55 <br /> FAX: (916) 255-3015 <br /> 1 December 1994 <br /> Mr. Roy Thun, Chairman <br /> Stockton Terminals Technical Committee <br /> c/o ARCO Products Company <br /> P.O. Box 2570 <br /> Los Angeles, CA 90051-0570 <br /> PHASE II POLLUTION ASSESSMENT REPORT, STOCKTON TERMINALS <br /> TECHNICAL COMMITTEE, PORT OF STOCKTON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> We have reviewed EMCON's 19 September 1994 Phase II Pollution Assessment Report and <br /> its 13 and 14 October 1994 letters for the Stockton Terminals Technical Committee. Our <br /> comments are detailed in the attached memorandum and summarized below. <br /> 1. Contamination in the C-zone and D-zone is not defined. <br /> 2. The extent of contamination in the A-zone and B-zone is defined. However, the <br /> hydropunch sample results which helped define the extent of contamination in <br /> these zones need to be confirmed by installing ground water MWs. EMCON's <br /> proposed MWs 1A, 1B, 2A, 3A, 5B, 6B, 7B, and 8B must be installed to verify <br /> the hydropunch sample results and establish the limits of contamination in the <br /> A-zone and B-zone. <br /> 3. Emcon has not conducted the air sparging trench pilot study. <br /> 4. There is no schedule for submittal of the feasibility study (FS) work plan. <br /> By 16 December 1994, please submit a time schedule to complete the tasks specified below: <br /> 1. Submit a work plan to install additional wells to confirm the hydropunch sample <br /> results obtained during the Phase II investigation. <br /> 2. Submit a work plan to define the extent of contamination in the C-zone and <br /> D-zone. <br /> 3. Submit the FS work plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.