My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
NAVY
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009171
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/30/2020 11:50:21 AM
Creation date
3/30/2020 11:19:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0009171
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004011
FACILITY_NAME
PORT OF STOCKTON-FUEL TERMINAL
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
NAVY
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
NAVY DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
577
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN.Governor <br /> CAI:IFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD— <br /> CENTRAL VALLEY REGION <br /> 3443 ROUTIER ROAD <br /> SACRAMENTO,CA x'5827-3098 <br /> 2 October 1987 0 <br /> ti <br /> �, P�rH <br /> Mr. Alexander Krygsman, Port Director <br /> Port of Stockton <br /> P.O. Box 2089 <br /> Stockton, CA 95201 <br /> PORT OF STOCKTON, FUEL TERMINAL AREA GROUND WATER INVESTIGATION, <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> Several new areas of ground water contamination at this site have <br /> been uncovered over the past several months (see attached memo) . <br /> The full extent of contamination at the site remains undefined. <br /> The technical report including the work plan you have submitted <br /> is inadequate: it does not present a proposal for determining the <br /> full horizontal and vertical extent of contamination as we <br /> requested in our letter of 16 June 1987; it does not provide a <br /> comprehensive evaluation of existing data; it does not describe <br /> the history and background: of each site adequately. <br /> Representative samples of ground water are still not available <br /> from properly constructed monitoring wells, and the site <br /> hydrogeology has not been characterized so that decisions on the <br /> steps necessary to prevent further migration of contamination can <br /> be made. See the attached memo for specific comments on the <br /> technical report and workplan. <br /> An adequate first phase for a ground water investigation of this <br /> magnitude would address all the points in our previous letter, as <br /> well as present the conceptual plan for the investigation through <br /> the cleanup phase. <br /> A recent letter concerning this investigation, written by Steven <br /> McDonald, attorney for the Port of Stockton, states that "the <br /> Port nor its tenants. . .do not admit authority or jurisdiction of <br /> the Regional Water Quality Control Board to compel production of <br /> information or further investigation." Section 13267 of the <br /> Water Code states: <br /> " (a) A regional board, in establishing or reviewing <br /> any water quality control plan or waste discharge <br /> requirements, or in connection with any action relating <br /> thereto or authorized by this division, may investigate <br /> the quality of any waters of the state within its <br /> region. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.