Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jeff Baker • -4- • 11 March 2010 <br /> Stockton Terminals Technical Committee <br /> Tesoro submitted the Pilot Study Work Plan Addendum (Addendum) on <br /> 19 February 2010. We will send comments on the Addendum under separate cover. <br /> Table 8 provides the results of the first two quarters of a four-quarter background <br /> sampling study for Tesoro's proposed well TS-4R hydrogen peroxide pilot test. <br /> Background groundwater monitoring is being conducted in four wells including TONT-3, <br /> TS-4R, TS/M-2, and TS-5 for total chromium, hexavalent chromium, vanadium, <br /> bromide, and bromate. Potential injection wells TS/RW-1 and TS-4R are being <br /> monitored for the presence of free phase product. No free phase product was observed <br /> during the fourth quarter. The background monitoring results show that low <br /> concentrations of all target compounds have been periodically detected in the <br /> background monitoring wells. <br /> Our comments are presented below. <br /> 1. The presence of MBAS in AR/MW-18C at 930 pg/L about 800 feet downgradient, <br /> and at a depth of 60 to 70 feet bgs, indicates that the lateral and vertical extent of <br /> this contaminant is undefined. The prevailing downward vertical gradients <br /> documented in the Annual Report and the high hydraulic conductivity value <br /> documented in Table 1 of the 9 July 1996 Bioassessment and Bioenhancement <br /> Investigation, Stockton Terminals Technical Committee Distribution Terminals show <br /> that the MBAS detected in AR/MW-18C could have migrated from November 2008 <br /> loading rack spill. In addition, this detection indicates that the OS may be incapable <br /> of preventing the offsite migration of this contaminant. To evaluated the lateral and <br /> vertical extent of MBAS, BP must now conduct quarterly MBAS monitoring in <br /> downgradient wells OW-9C, PS/MW-20C, OW-3CR, and OW-4C and report the <br /> results in future quarterly reports. If the first quarter 2010 monitoring has not yet <br /> taken place, these results should be reported in the first quarter report, which is due <br /> on 1 May 2010. <br /> 2. Our 8 October 2009 letter to BP concurred with BP's proposal to continue quarterly <br /> over-purge events in all on-site monitoring wells until sampling results show MBAS <br /> is less than or equal to 500 pg/L for four consecutive quarters. In addition, we <br /> requested that BP to conduct over-purging in off-site wells. The discovery of WAS <br /> in AR/MW-18C may also indicate that the interinn over-purge remedy may be <br /> ineffective at mitigating MBAS because this contaminant may not be limited to the <br /> immediate vicinity of the monitoring wells in which it has been detected. BP may <br /> continue to conduct the quarterly interim remedy until the additional monitoring <br /> requested in the previous comment results in the lateral delineation of the WAS <br /> plume. Then BP must begin to formulate a strategy for vertical delineation and <br /> identifying a permanent remedy. <br /> 3. By 1 May 2010, BP must submit the evaluation of alternate remedial technologies <br /> referenced in the 29 October 2009 Helium Tracer Study for Biosparging Feasibility <br /> Report. In light of the current groundwater monitoring data which show that WAS is <br /> widely distributed throughout the subsurface, the evaluation must also include a <br /> method for mitigating MBAS. <br />