Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jeff Goold • - 2 - • 14 February 2008 <br /> Shell Stockton Terminal <br /> G <br /> project, would be leaving soon for maternity leave, and that Mr. Goold would temporarily <br /> assume her responsibilities in her absence. <br /> Discussions in the 29 November 2007 teleconference primarily addressed Shell's concerns <br /> about discharge of the treated DPE effluent and the effluent limit for TBA. Mr. Gaarder said <br /> the easiest discharge option is using Shell's existing City of Stockton (City) sewer discharge <br /> permit, but Shell has had problems in the past meeting the City's five microgram per liter <br /> (pg/L) TBA effluent limit and the lower explosive level (LEL) threshold. Shell stated that the <br /> LEL exceedences were caused by excess methane levels backing up from the City's sewer <br /> system, and Shell can control that problem. Shell said the bigger problem is meeting the City's <br /> TBA effluent limit, and they wish to avoid a City notice of violation (NOV), even one that carries <br /> no monetary penalty. Shell requested more time to appeal to the City to raise the discharge <br /> limit to 12 parts per billion (ppb) and allow an occasional violation, which they had been able to <br /> arrange with one other municipality. Regional Water Board staff agreed with this strategy and <br /> scheduled a 14 December follow-up teleconference. <br /> During the 14 December teleconference, Shell stated that they had decided to discharge <br /> wastewater generated during the DPE pilot test to a holding tank and transport it to Shell's <br /> refinery in Martinez, as is currently done with groundwater generated from the groundwater <br /> pump and treat system. Shell also addressed Comment No. 3 listed above by consenting to <br /> conduct DPE testing in all three SAs. <br /> In response to the other comments listed above Shell <br /> 1) stated that they did not have enough information to provide costs for the excavation and <br /> SVE/AS options, <br /> 2) stated that site-wide groundwater cleanup cannot be completed due to current site use <br /> but would be re-evaluated if site use changes in the future, and <br /> 3) acknowledged that not much is known about the pump except that is permanently <br /> lodged at the bottom of MW-10. <br /> To conduct the DPE pilot test, Shell proposes to install three 4-inch diameter DPE extraction <br /> wells in the MW-1, MW-10, and MW-13 SAs and two 2-inch diameter observation wells in the <br /> MW-1 and MW-10 SAs using hollow-stem augers. Shell proposes to first dewater the <br /> saturated soils by running the extraction wells for one week prior to the start of the DPE test. <br /> DPE testing will be conducted sequentially in each SA by incrementally increasing the vacuum <br /> to the maximum airflow rate and then conducting a 24-hour DPE operation to determine if the <br /> rate can be sustained. Extended testing may be conducted in a select SA following the initial <br /> one-day test. <br /> Groundwater extraction will be performed using a trailer-mounted liquid-ring pump and <br /> thermal/catalytic oxidizer (trailer) to treat extracted vapors to San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution <br /> Control District requirements. The extraction system is equipped with a knock-out tank to <br /> remove entrained groundwater from the vapor stream. Groundwater drawdown and induced <br /> vacuum will be monitored in the newly installed 2-inch diameter observation wells, and in other <br /> proximal wells during the DPE pilot test. An organic vapor analyzer (OVA) will be used to field <br /> measure hydrocarbon vapors in the extracted vapor stream, and vapor samples will <br /> periodically be collected in one-liter tedlar bags for laboratory analysis. Laboratory analysis will <br />