Laserfiche WebLink
5.3.2.2 FEASIBILITY AND COST EFFECTIVENESS <br /> CRA's October 30, 2009 AS/SVE Pilot Test Report and Feasibility Study Addendum <br /> presented the results of the AS/SVE pilot test. The pilot test data demonstrates that AS <br /> is technically feasible based on the following: <br /> Air (19 standard cubic feet per minute at 12 pounds per square inch) was <br /> successfully introduced into the zone of contamination. <br /> • The distribution of air extended up to 15 feet from the injection well in all <br /> directions as evidenced by induced pressure, groundwater mounding, and/or <br /> increasing dissolved oxygen (DO) and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) <br /> levels. <br /> • A spike in hydrocarbon vapor concentration at the time of AS breakthrough <br /> suggests that AS volatilized hydrocarbons and increased mass removal. <br /> However, hydrocarbon vapor concentrations decreased to lower levels during <br /> the test. It is uncertain whether source material was limited and/or reduced or <br /> AS flow was diluting the hydrocarbon vapor concentrations. <br /> • An increase in SVE flow also corresponded with AS breakthrough. <br /> The SVE pilot test data,DPE pilot test data, and historical SVE system data indicate that <br /> SVE is technically feasible, but its effectiveness is limited by the shallow groundwater <br /> table. TPHg vapor concentrations and mass removal were higher during DPE testing of <br /> well MW-37 than during AS/SVE testing of OW-2/MW-22. However, well MW-37 is <br /> closer to source material than the AS/SVE test wells. Lastly, AS/SVE is expected to be <br /> less effective for TPHd (in comparison to TPHg) due to higher boiling points of the <br /> compounds found in the TPHd range. <br /> Based on the results of the pilot test,CRA moved forward with AS/SVE implementation <br /> with the concurrence of the Central Valley Water Board. CRA completed the system <br /> design and solicited contractor bids for construction services and vendor bids for major <br /> equipment. Select figures from the AS/SVE design plan set are included as Appendix E. <br /> Due to the logistics of working around the existing terminal infrastructure and the <br /> electrical service source locations, two separate systems covering the three source areas <br /> was deemed the best design approach. <br /> Completion of permitting is estimated to cost approximately $25,000. Based on bids,the <br /> contractor and equipment vendor prices are approximately $300,000 and $292,000, <br /> respectively. Trenching and installation of horizontal SVE wells will result in removing <br /> approximately 920 tons of soil. Transportation and disposal costs are approximately <br /> 241729(33) 18 CONESTOGA-ROVERS&ASSOCIATES <br />