My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1993-1996
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
0
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0506203
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1993-1996
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2020 3:10:16 PM
Creation date
3/31/2020 2:30:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1993-1996
RECORD_ID
PR0506203
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0007271
FACILITY_NAME
LINCOLN CNTR ENV REMEDIATION TRUST
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
223
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JOINT COMMENTS PREPARED BY HOYT CORPORATION AND R. R. STREET & <br /> CO. INC. TO THE FIRST FINAL CONSENT DECREE, ORDER, AND JUDGMENT <br /> INTRODUCTION <br /> Hoyt Corporation and R.R. Street & Co. Inc. <br /> (collectively, "Equipment Manufacturers") , through their <br /> respective counsel, hereby submit the following comments to the <br /> First Final Consent Decree, Order, Judgment and Reference to <br /> Special Master ("Consent Decree") : <br /> The Equipment Manufacturers strongly concur with the <br /> goal of the Consent Decree to clean up the contamination at the <br /> Lincoln Center ("Site") . Equipment Manufacturers are, however, <br /> in a difficult position regarding the Consent Decree itself. It <br /> is apparent from the terms of the Consent Decree and discussions <br /> with counsel for Plaintiff LPL that the Equipment Manufacturers <br /> will be sued in contribution for expended funds despite the fact <br /> that they (i) were not allowed to participate in the negotiations <br /> among the Settling Parties and their insurance carriers, and (ii) <br /> they were not made aware of the terms of the global settlement <br /> agreement among the Settling Parties and their insurance carriers <br /> that precipitated the Consent Decree. Most importantly, the <br /> Equipment Manufacturers are unaware of the allocation of <br /> settlement costs among the various Settling Parties, including <br /> the insurance carriers, that will govern the Settling Parties ' <br /> rights and obligations as to the Equipment Manufacturers during <br /> the pendency of this lawsuit. <br /> LA\16207\031\50C0MDCG.002 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.