Laserfiche WebLink
Harding Lawson Associates <br /> January 14, 1991 <br /> 20264,004.02 <br /> John Breuner Company <br /> Mr. Peter Meier <br /> Page 3 <br /> compacted backfill material and overlying loading dock. The piping trench backfill was compacted <br /> using Whacker equipment. <br /> Soil samples were analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons(TPH)as diesel and gasoline, and for <br /> benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes(BTEX). Samples were also analyzed for ethylene <br /> dibromide(EDB)and organic lead,because the tank at one time had apparently stored leaded gasoline <br /> (as noted on the former dispenser). <br /> Review of analytical results indicates that TPH as diesel and gasoline were not detected above <br /> laboratory detection limits(10 ppm)in any of the soil samples, with the exception of sample DI-2.5 <br /> collected beneath the former dispenser. Gasoline was reported at a concentration of 390 ppm and diesel <br /> at a concentration of 37 ppm in this sample. <br /> Benzene, toluene, xylenes, and ethylbenzene were not detected above laboratory detection limits <br /> (0.025 ppm for benzene and toluene, and 0.075 ppm for xylenes and ethylbenzene)in any of the soil <br /> samples, with the exception of 0.065 ppm of toluene reported in sample PP4-3. <br /> Organic lead was not detected in any of the analyzed soil samples. EDB was detected in three samples <br /> (TS-14, PPI-3, and PP4-3)at concentrations ranging from 0.180 to 0.370 ppm, and was not <br /> detected above a detection limit of 0.125 ppm in the other samples. <br /> On the basis of H1A's review of LF's November 9, 1989 report, it appears that a limited release of <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons has occurred at the site in the vicinity of the dispenser and has impacted the <br /> soil in that area. The extent of soil containing petroleum hydrocarbons is unknown at this time. From <br /> the absence of TPH as gasoline in samples with detectable concentrations of EDB at the site, it appears <br /> unlikely that the EDB is associated with a gasoline release at the site. Since EDB is known to have <br /> been used widely in rural areas for agricultural purposes, its introduction into site soils is possibly <br /> associated with past agricultural usage in the vicinity. <br /> It is not clear after reviewing the Levine-Fricke report if soils from underneath the former dispenser <br /> containing elevated concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were removed or buried in place. <br /> A cursory review of hydrogeologic literature for the Stockton area indicates that the site is located in <br /> the San Joaquin Valley groundwater basin, and the depth to groundwater is approximately 60 to <br /> 70 feet. The fine grained nature of the native soils, the limited release, and the depth to groundwater of <br /> 60 to 70 feet in the site vicinity suggests the threat to groundwater is minimal. <br /> PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF WORK <br /> The purpose of this investigation is to evaluate the extent of petroleum hydrocarbons in the soil in the <br /> former dispenser area. Because the threat to groundwater appears to be minimal, HLA does not <br /> propose to perform a groundwater investigation at the site. However, work will be performed to <br /> confirm the anticipated groundwater conditions. HLA intends to perform this investigation by <br /> completing the following tasks: <br />