My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 3
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
7647
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0505534
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 3
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/31/2020 4:27:29 PM
Creation date
3/31/2020 4:12:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 3
RECORD_ID
PR0505534
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0006840
FACILITY_NAME
TOSCO SUPER T MARKET
STREET_NUMBER
7647
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
07748014
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
7647 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
265
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page l of 1 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2011 12:01 PM <br /> To: 'Lathrop, Shelby S (Shaw Environmental, Inc.)' <br /> Cc: 'Benjamin.Chevlen@stantec.com' <br /> Subject: fprmer TOC #172 <br /> ! V <br /> Shelby, <br /> I recieved two Stantec submittals for this site today on Geotracker. QMR-1st-2011 dated 3- <br /> 15-2011 and "Well Destruction & Well Protection Report", dated 3-15-11 . After reviewing each <br /> I still have NO idea when you'll be doing any of the required work onsite or the offsite well <br /> install. The conclusions in both reports were missing dates for expected/required work and no <br /> site status/progress information was provided. I'm not happy. I was under the impression back <br /> in Fall 2010 that we were going to work together on advancing this site. <br /> The EHD was very cooperative with the rush to get the wells out and to approve CP requests <br /> as 711 entered into this site's future. <br /> Now, over five months later and we/CP are no further than we were in Oct 2010 after the wells <br /> and remed system was removed. Seems CP got what it wanted. Can't say the same for the <br /> EHD. I was by the site today and other than run down and looking like a dump site, it's the <br /> same as it was in Nov 2010, except the building is showing signs of either roof damage or a <br /> breakin, it's still standing and the weeds are growing higher and higher. <br /> It was never my intention to rush to comply with CP's wishes only to have the EHD left in the <br /> dark for many months with NO significant compliance efforts made on your part to advance <br /> this site back into full remediation with replaced wells/remed system. I feel taken advantage <br /> of. <br /> Mike Infurna <br /> SJCEHD <br /> 3!22/)(11 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.