My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
FIELD DOCUMENTS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
N
>
99 (STATE ROUTE 99)
>
5942
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0515482
>
FIELD DOCUMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 1:56:54 PM
Creation date
4/1/2020 3:01:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
FIELD DOCUMENTS
RECORD_ID
PR0515482
PE
2950
FACILITY_ID
FA0012177
FACILITY_NAME
AUTO FACTORY
STREET_NUMBER
5942
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 99
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95212
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5942 N HWY 99
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'y 02 October 2000 <br /> AGE-NC Project No. 00-699 <br /> Page 7 of 8 <br /> 4.4. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF SOIL SAMPLES <br /> r A total of 4 soil samples were analyzed for TPH-g,TPH-d,BTEX, and the suite of five oxygenated <br /> fuel additives by EPA Method 8260 Modified. <br /> None of the analytes tested for in the 4 soil samples were detected at concentrations at or above the <br /> laboratory reporting limits. <br /> Analytical results of soil samples are summarized on Table 2. The laboratory reports (AAI Order <br /> No.A0062919), quality assurance and quality control(QA/QC)report and chain-of-custody forms <br /> are included in Appendix C. <br /> 4.5. ANALYTICAL RESULTS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> After installation of the ground water monitoring well on the site, the well was developed and <br /> sampled.Water samples were analyzed for TPH-g,TPH-d,BTEX;and the suite of five oxygenated <br /> fuel additives. <br /> None of the analytes tested for in the 4 soil samples were detected at concentrations at or above the <br /> laboratory reporting limits. <br /> Analytical results of water samples collected during July 2000 are summarized on Table 3; The <br /> laboratory report '(AAI Order No. A00070610), QA/QC report and chain-of-custody form are <br /> included in Appendix D. <br /> 5.0. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS <br /> The following conclusions were drawn from the results of this investigation: <br /> • The static water level was determined to be within the screened interval of the ground.water <br /> Low monitoring well installed in July 2000 (MW 1). <br /> • None of the analytes tested for in the soil and ground-water samples collected from MW-1 <br /> were detected at or above laboratory reporting limits. <br /> V <br /> ty - - <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.