My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-1997
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_1985-1997
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 2:47:19 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:16:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
1985-1997
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Antonia K. J. Vorster -2- 5 August 1988 <br /> Requirements guidance document. <br /> 2. KEI's proposal calls for excavating about 6, 000 cubic yards of <br /> soil contaminated with gasoline related compounds and methylene <br /> chloride, aerating it, and backfilling it into the excavation. The soil <br /> cleanup level recommended in this proposal is less than 10 ppm Total <br /> Petroleum Hydrocarbons. <br /> According to soil investigation work done by Kleinfelder, the amount of <br /> contaminated soil exceeds 6, 000 cubic yards. The Problem Assessment <br /> Workplan should include a Soil Remediation Plan that details how the <br /> entire amount of contaminated soil will be cleaned up to a level of less <br /> than .l ppm TPH. A cleanup level of 1 ppm is necessary to eliminate the <br /> source of ground water contamination. In-situ treatment should be <br /> explored since the excavation necessary to remove all the contaminated <br /> soil will have to be over 30 feet deep. Land availability and air <br /> quality standards make the feasibility of such an excavation at this <br /> location questionable. <br /> If excavation is selected as the cleanup method, the Soil Remediation <br /> Plan should include at a minimum, an excavation/aeration plan approved <br /> by the San Joaquin County Air Pollution Control District and a sampling <br /> plan for the excavated soils and the boundaries of the excavation. <br /> Conclusions <br /> A Problem Assessment Workplan should be submitted which includes a <br /> detailed plan and time schedule for completion of the plume definition <br /> phase of the ground water investigation. Implementation and completion <br /> of the Problem Assessment work must result in complete delineation of <br /> the ground water pollution and an assessment of remedial action <br /> alternatives. <br /> A Soil Remediation Plan should be submitted along with the Problem <br /> Assessment Workplan that includes a description of and time schedule for <br /> mitigation of the entire source of ground water pollution (contaminated <br /> soils) . The cleanup level goal is 1 ppm total petroleum hydrocarbons. <br /> Unocal has not been responsive to our previous requests to complete the <br /> Problem Assessment phase of this project and has apparently backed off <br /> from the interim ground water cleanup and soil venting plans which we <br /> spent considerable time on and approved of in our 4 March 1988 letter. <br /> We should consider enforcement action if Unocal fails to comply with the <br /> work requested in this memo. <br /> DLB <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.