Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Infurna <br /> From: Kasey Foley <br /> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 3:00 PM <br /> To: 'Marty Hartzell' <br /> Cc: Mike Infurna; Margaret Lagorio <br /> Subject: RE: Status Report CAO 5-00-707 <br /> Marty, I received the results for the TCLP and though they are barely legible, they appear <br /> to be ND, so the ball is out of EHD's court and in yours? Also, you may want to talk with <br /> the CIWMB about this site as an illegal landfill. The contact would be Sue Markie at <br /> (916) 341-6324. , <br /> I am having Delta fax the results to you because if I did it they would be beyond <br /> illegible. <br /> Kasey Foley <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Marty Hartzell [mailto:HartzeM@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 10:04 AM <br /> TO: MInfurna@phs.hs.co.san-joaquin.ca.us <br /> Cc: kfoley@phs.hs.co.san-joaquin.ca.us; Cori Condon <br /> Subject: RE: Status Report CAO 5-00-707 <br /> Thank you Mike, I stand corrected. The 10 December 2001 report I reed has total chromium <br /> and hexavalent chromium analyses only. I have not seen the additional testing analytical <br /> results. Kasey said she would fax the data to me once it is re e d. Marty. <br /> >>> Mike Infurna <MInfurna@phs.hs.co.san-joaquin.ca.us> 01/07/02 09:48AM >>> <br /> good morning Marty. . <br /> I just checked with Kasey myself and I need to clear up a point. <br /> Kasey said EHD has the TTLC and the STLC for Cr. . . .it's the TCLP that is <br /> still missing. . <br /> And based on some previous phone conversation with Steve, I have discovered <br /> that pretty much no matter what level the Cr is or isn't, the RIW <br /> replacement well WILL GO IN THE SAME HOLE as test hole #2 started in. . (The <br /> most recent hole that discovered all this solid waste in the first <br /> place) . .Steve said that the soil will be evaluated around 80 ' bgs to see <br /> that they're OUT OF THE garbage and if so, drill on. . . . .THe 200' grout seal <br /> is more than enough to protect the well and since our ordinance does not <br /> regulate the grout seal for "irrigation wells", weatEHD are pretty much <br /> out of the commenting process, especially if the contaminants are <br /> "non-haz" . . . .We RECOMMEND they don't place it there, but it's only a <br /> recommendation. ! <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Marty Hartzell [mailto:HartzeM@rb5s.swrcb.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2002 9:25 AM <br /> To: sbright@environmentalauditinc.com; ghh@ghheng.com; <br /> MInfurna@phs.hs.co.san-joaquin.ca.us; Cori Condon; <br /> dwatts@sjdccd.cc.ca.us; tguantone@sjdccd.cc.ca.us; wtnicker@unocal.com <br /> Cc: tarbuckle@sjdccd.cc.ca.us; jatracy@unocal.com <br /> Subject: Re: Status Report CAO 5-00-707 <br /> Hello Steve, <br /> I just spoke with Kasey Foley at the County, and she has not reed the final <br /> lab reports for the Chromium STLC analysis, which will determine if the <br /> garbage debris is considered hazardous waste. I suggest that we wait until <br /> all data has been reed before we agree on the final irrigation well <br /> location. <br /> 1 <br />