My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-CURRENT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-CURRENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 3:01:51 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:25:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2001-CURRENT
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
701
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
09/11/2001 11:42 71463267 EAI PAGE 04 <br /> ring a9 01 II: Qla R° K Management 20' 04 5066 p. 4 <br /> or abandoned gas station. By reducing the distance from 2,100 feet to 1,750 <br /> feet, a larger area of potential sites results, see Figure 1. <br /> The area of potential sites still lies southwest of Budd Center. Possible sites <br /> within the Budd area have been determined by examining a composite utility plan <br /> for the area. The composite plan was furnished by the College and depicts the <br /> location of water, sewer, storm drain, irrigation, and electrical services along with <br /> the location of parking lots, walkways, and landscaped areas. Areas within <br /> parking lots or landscaped areas that could be developed were selected as <br /> potential sites. <br /> Five potential sites for the new well exist and each were examined to determine <br /> how they meet the seven objective criteria, see Figure 2. The following table <br /> lists the acceptability of each of the sites, along with the original site as compared <br /> to the criteria on a scale of 1 to 10, with 1 being the least acceptable and 10 <br /> being the most: <br /> Site <br /> Criteria 1 01 11 21 3 4 s <br /> 1. Distance from gas station 10 10 10 10 8 10 <br /> 2. Away from existing well 10 9 9 9 9 9 <br /> 3. Close to 12 KVA power 1 10 8 7 8 7 <br /> 4. Close to irrigation main 1 10 9 8 7 7 <br /> S. 50' from storm &sewer 9 10 9 7 7 8 <br /> G. Developable without disruption 10 9 9 4 6 8 <br /> 7. Easily accessed 10 10 10 10 a 8 <br /> TOTAL 51 68 64 55 53 57 <br /> Based on the table, site 1 best fits all of the criteria with site 2 following close <br /> behind; other sites are less favorable. Site 1 is very close to power, and close to <br /> irrigation main lines. Being in the comer of a parking lot(W1), the area could be <br /> reclaimed from the parking lot without a major disruption of traffic flow or parking <br /> patterns in the lot. <br /> COSTS <br /> The cost of constructing a well and pumping plant will be slightly more at the <br /> existing location versus one of the potential sites, <br /> The existing irrigation well has been in service for 50 years. The well was <br /> designed and constructed as an agricultural irrigation well using a cable tool <br /> method. Every water bearing strata from the ground surface to its bottom was <br /> tapped. Because of its design and construction, the well routinely pumped sand. <br /> Water from the well was used for flood irrigation of the State Farm and it was not <br /> required to be sand free. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.