My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-CURRENT
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PACIFIC
>
5400
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0522692
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_2001-CURRENT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2020 3:01:51 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 2:25:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
2001-CURRENT
RECORD_ID
PR0522692
PE
2957
FACILITY_ID
FA0015465
FACILITY_NAME
FORMER MONTGOMERY WARDS AUTO SRV CTR
STREET_NUMBER
5400
STREET_NAME
PACIFIC
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
10227008
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
5400 PACIFIC AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
701
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Unocal • -2- 14 April 2006' ' <br /> 5400-5606 Pacific Ave., Stockton : <br /> B. Deletion of the following analytes from the MRP since the monitoring wells "...have no concentrations above <br /> screening levels for the groundwater-to-indoor air pathway." <br /> l)n-Butylbenzene, 2) sec-Butylbenzene,3) 1,2-Dichloroethane,4)Ethylbenzene, 5)Isopropylbenzene, <br /> 6)Methyl tert-Butyl Ether(MtBE), 7)n-Butylbenzene, 8)Toluene, 9) 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene, and . <br /> 10)Xylenes. <br /> C. States that "For the remaining wells, it is recommended that the specific constituents showing concentrations <br /> above the screening levels be monitored until the concentration has been below the screening level for four <br /> consecutive monitoring events... ". <br /> D. Requests reducing Summa Canister soil gas monitoring from the vapor extraction wells from quarterlyto <br /> annually,during the second quarter of the calendar year. Field instruments would be used for quarterly soil gas <br /> monitoring. <br /> Report 1 Comment: <br /> 1)The Report recommendations and conclusions for groundwater monitoring do not consider Regional Board <br /> Water Quality Goals(WQGs)and Beneficial Uses of groundwater at this site. Specifically,TableA-1 screening <br /> levels exceed WQGs for petroleum hydrocarbons. Site groundwater has Municipal and Agricultural Beneficial <br /> Uses,and the Report does not recommend screening levels that are protective of those Beneficial Uses. Also. <br /> there are nearby sensitive receptors that were not considered in the Report(e.g., Delta College Irrigation Well). <br /> Therefore, I cannot concur to the Report recommendations for changes to groundwater monitoring at this time. <br /> 2)I do concur to reducing the Summa Canister soil gas monitoring to annually, as long as the field instrument <br /> monitoring can be used to accurately calculate the mass of petroleum hydrocarbons removed by the Soil Vapor <br /> Extraction system. If achieving accuracy with field instruments is problematic, then Summa Canister soil gas <br /> monitoring will revert to the current schedule. <br /> Report 1 Recommendations: In a phone conversation with ENSR on 3 August 2005, I recommended that <br /> UNOCAL resubmit the Report with reduction in sampling recommendations that are also protective of Water <br /> Quality and Beneficial Uses. Specifically,I said the Report should take into consideration what analytical data is <br /> needed to support a future closure request(groundwater modeling, plume stability, and declining concentration <br /> trends)based on the requirements of Appendix A Reports(available from the Internet at <br /> http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/rwgcb5/available_documents/ug_tanks/Tri-Regionals_Appendix_A.pdf),which wells <br /> are necessary to provide that analytical data, and which wells provide sentinel duty(wam of changes in the <br /> groundwater plume)and need to be sampled quarterly. With the proper documentation and rationale,reductions <br /> in the frequency of monitoring and deletion of specific analyses for certain wells may be acceptable. <br /> Report 2 <br /> The requested changes to the Monitoring and Reporting Program (MRP)are stated in the <br /> Conclusions/Recommendations Section of Report 2: "It is ENSR's professional opinion that the TPHg and <br /> benzene plumes beneath the site are stable and demonstrating an overall decrease. Moreover, ENSR has <br /> observed an overall decline in influent vapor concentrations related to the SVE system, and the SVE system has <br /> not achieved amass removal rate of at least one pound per day lb/day of TPHg since March of 2005. During <br /> winter months the SVE system is prone to unscheduled shutdowns as a result of elevated groundwater <br /> overwhelming the water storage capacity at the Site. For these reasons, ENSR requests approval to temporarily <br /> cease SVE system operation during the rainy season. ENSR believes that restarting the system is justified for <br /> mass removal. ENSSR has restarted the system twice following prolonged shutdown periods. Following both of <br /> those periods the SVE system achieved mass removal rates greater than a pound of TPHg per day: 19.02 lbs/day <br /> in September of 2004 and 3.651bs/day in March of 2005. The anticipated restart of SVE operation would be <br /> during the latter half of the second quarter of 2006 " <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.