My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
O
>
120 (STATE ROUTE 120)
>
17000
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0523467
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/19/2024 4:01:10 PM
Creation date
4/2/2020 4:34:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0523467
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0007060
FACILITY_NAME
WINE GROUP, THE
STREET_NUMBER
17000
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
STATE ROUTE 120
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
24506030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17000 E HWY 120
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\sballwahn
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Californi-A Regional Water Quality Control Board 0�-°"'; <br /> \- Central Valley Region 'r <br /> vRobert Schneider,Chair <br /> Dan Skopec Arnold <br /> Acling Secretary Sacramento Main Office Schwarzenegger <br /> 11020 Sun Center Drive#200,Rancho Cordova,California 956706114 Governor <br /> Phone(916)464-3291•FAX(916)464-4645 <br /> http://www.waterbouds.ca.gov/cenualvalley D <br /> sc[T <br /> 20 April 2006 <br /> APR 2 4 '�UOo <br /> Paul Franzia <br /> Barrel Ten Quarter Circle Land Company ENPERhh�T�SERVICES <br /> 6342 Bystrum Road <br /> Ceres, CA 95307 <br /> CONDITIONAL APPROVAL, BARREL TEN WINERY, ESCALON, SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> I have reviewed the 31 March 2006 Groundwater Investigation Work Plan, prepared by <br /> Kennedy/Jenks Consultants. The Workplan was prepared to describe additional investigation <br /> of groundwater quality and potential sources of groundwater constituents of concern near the <br /> Barrel Ten winery. Staff considers the groundwater quality at the winery to be degraded as a <br /> result of site activities, including land application of wastewater; the Discharger has stated off- <br /> site sources may be responsible for some of the groundwater conditions observed. The <br /> Workplan describes activities that will provide data to better characterize the source of <br /> groundwater degradation. <br /> I have the following comments on the Workplan: <br /> 1. In Section 1.8, the Workplan states, "The locations of these two wells [MW-6 and MW-71 <br /> are considered cross-gradient relative to groundwater flow (Figures 3 and 4)." Staff does <br /> not agree with that assessment. As previously stated in the 14 October 2003 Conditional <br /> Approval, the close proximity of the wells to the land application areas may result in <br /> samples collected from that area representing a mixture of background groundwater <br /> quality and wastewater percolate. <br /> 2. Section 1.8.1 states, "Surface water was estimated in the Effluent Limit Determination <br /> Technical Report to take approximately 50 years to reach groundwater at 55 feet bgs, <br /> according to the soil moisture loading model." Staff recognizes the slow nature of <br /> groundwater flow, but if the data from the pan lysimeters provided in the 12 August 2004, <br /> Effluent Limit Determination Technical Report, is considered, groundwater conditions may <br /> worsen considerably as a result of the continued discharge. The pan lysimeters <br /> contained percolate with Fixed Dissolved Solids (FDS) concentrations often greater than <br /> 3,000 mg/L. If the percolate reaches groundwater, it will result in further groundwater <br /> quality degradation. <br /> 3. Section 1.8.2.3 describes locating off-site sources, but the proposed drilling and sampling <br /> locations have already been determined. It may be prudent to identify potential sources <br /> first, and then perform sampling to determine if they have impacted groundwater quality. <br /> The chemical constituent concentration contour figures are flawed because they contain <br /> errors such as inconsistent contour intervals, missed contour lines, and the interpretation <br /> ignores groundwater flow direction considerations related to hydrodynamic dispersion. <br /> The additional data provided in this investigation may clarify the interpretation. <br /> California Environmental Protection Agency <br /> Cd Recycled Paper <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.